Talk:Hey, Hey, It's Esther Blueburger/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

This article is in very good shape. I've reviewed the prose and all the sources and everything seems to be in order, and the article seems to cover the broad aspects of the subject very well. The only problem I found is that there are three dead links that need to be replaced: This one, which is used to cite that the film played at the Stockholm International Film Festival; this one, for the Empire magazine review; and this one, regarding the Film Critics Circle of Australia award.

Also, do you think it's worth adding to the lead that Danielle Catanzariti won the Australian Film Institute's Young Actor Award for her role in this movie?

I'll place this article on hold until the links problem can be addressed. Nicely done! — Hun ter Ka hn 19:55, 14 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Added AFI award to lead. Couldn't find archives for the dead links - I simply removed the links from the two that are available in print, and I commented out the link from the Stockholm site so that it doesn't show up on the reflist but it can be seen by editors. Thanks for the review :) —97198 (talk) 13:28, 15 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

GA Checklist

GA review (see here for criteria)

It is reasonably well written.
a (prose): b (MoS):
It is factually accurate and verifiable.
a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
It is broad in its coverage.
a (major aspects): b (focused):
It follows the neutral point of view policy.
Fair representation without bias:
It is stable.
No edit wars, etc.:
It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
Overall:
Pass/Fail:
Well done! That's a pass! — Hun ter Ka hn 14:29, 15 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks again! —97198 (talk) 07:48, 16 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]