Talk:Hewlett-Packard spying scandal
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
| |||||||||||
Link
[edit]Maybe there can be a link from scandals to here?--M3rrick 05:43, 28 October 2006 (UTC)
Removed the "crime" categories
[edit]Since as of this writing the article indicates there have been no convictions, and in fact talks about criminal charges being dismissed, I removed the "crime" category tags from the article. I left the "scandal" categories in place. Note that crime categories should not be used unless someone is convicted of a crime, not for alleged crimes. Dugwiki 21:00, 20 March 2007 (UTC)
current event?
[edit]I don't see any recent activity. Are any of these charges or cases still pending, or can we remove the "current event" tag? --Zippy 05:51, 3 June 2007 (UTC)
External links modified
[edit]Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to one external link on Hewlett-Packard spying scandal. Please take a moment to review my edit. You may add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it, if I keep adding bad data, but formatting bugs should be reported instead. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether, but should be used as a last resort. I made the following changes:
- Attempted to fix sourcing for http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/c/a/2006/09/09/HP.TMP
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).
An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 07:58, 29 March 2016 (UTC)
- Bot's edit was incorrect - it marked this link as dead, when it is not. (Probably a parser issue, since text of link was
https://web.archive.org/web/20110524234705/http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/c/a/2006/09/09/HP.TMP. Reverted. Charlesreid1 (talk) 21:43, 6 April 2016 (UTC)
External links modified
[edit]Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Hewlett-Packard spying scandal. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/c/a/2006/09/09/HP.TMP
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 17:27, 30 April 2016 (UTC)