Talk:Hester Site

United States: Mississippi Low‑importance

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	Mississippi portal This article is supported by WikiProject Mississippi (assessed as Mid-importance).

National Register of Historic Places High‑importance

	National Register of Historic Places portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject National Register of Historic Places, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of U.S. historic sites listed on the National Register of Historic Places on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.National Register of Historic PlacesWikipedia:WikiProject National Register of Historic PlacesTemplate:WikiProject National Register of Historic PlacesNational Register of Historic Places articles
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

WikiProject Alabama Removal

The Hester Site is located in Monroe County Mississippi, not Alabama and as such is not an Alabama project. Jasgrider 16:42, 2 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

"Consolidation" of links?

Those two terms (Woodland and Mississippian periods) do no mean the same thing, see "The term "Woodland Period" was introduced in the 1930s as a generic term for prehistoric sites falling between the Archaic hunter-gatherers and the agriculturalist Mississippian cultures." at the Woodland page and Woodland period#Late Woodland period (500–1000 CE). "Consolidating" them does not eliminate an extraneous or duplicated term, it removes a link to a separate archaeological culture that occupied the site. Having the link makes the article better. He iro 15:53, 26 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]