Talk:Hermione Granger/GA1

GA Reassessment

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
As part of Wikipedia:WikiProject Good articles' Project quality task force, I am re-reviewing this article to ensure compliance with current good article criteria. I have determined that it doesn't meet criteria for the reasons outlined below and needs a bit of work. As it's not inconceivable that my concerns can be addressed in a relatively timely manner, I'm putting the article on hold for seven days or longer if sufficient work is done before then. The issues:

Comprehensiveness: The article is better than most Harry Potter bios in that it does have a section on critical analysis, but there's next to nothing on critical reception in general and the analysis section needs more opinions and expansion. The appearances section can be cut down dramatically, increasing clarity, as can the 'attributes' section (and reworking the arrangement of the sections may help in readability as well.)
Images: what do File:HermyLindsay.jpg and File:Hermionehand.jpg significantly add to the article as per WP:NFCC? There's no major critical commentary about Lohan's portrayal or Emma Watson's early appearance.
References: Spell out the books instead of using esoteric templates, and use page numbers instead of vague chapters.

If you have any comments you can direct them here or my talk page. --Der Wohltemperierte Fuchs^(talk) 17:12, 7 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

As there's been no movement on this, I'm delisting. Remember you may relist at WP:GAN any time you feel it meets criteria. I don't watchlist old GA discussion, so any further inquiries should be brought to my talk page. Cheers, --Der Wohltemperierte Fuchs^(talk) 00:49, 15 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]