This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
This article is part of WikiProject Jainism, an attempt to promote better coordination, content distribution, and cross-referencing between pages dealing with Jainism. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page for more details on the projects.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Germany, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Germany on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.GermanyWikipedia:WikiProject GermanyTemplate:WikiProject GermanyGermany articles
Thank you for your suggestion. When you believe an article needs improvement, please feel free to make those changes. Wikipedia is a wiki, so anyone can edit almost any article by simply following the edit this page link at the top. The Wikipedia community encourages you to be bold in updating pages. Don't worry too much about making honest mistakes—they're likely to be found and corrected quickly. If you're not sure how editing works, check out how to edit a page, or use the sandbox to try out your editing skills. New contributors are always welcome. You don't even need to log in (although there are many reasons why you might want to). Shreevatsa (talk) 17:17, 23 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
I subscribe to these suggestions with the addition that the editor should have verifiable references at hand to support the changes they make and note the references when they make the changes. I changed the "noreferences" banner for this article to "refimprove". I think some of the mysterious information is a translation of German Wikipedia. I wish mistakes got corrected quickly, and often they do, but for a less-visited article like this they may hang around for awhile. I saw one project above rating this article at B, but I think start is more realistic, although a good case might be made for C. Bob Burkhardt (talk) 17:18, 28 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]