Jump to content

Talk:Here Comes Your Man/GA1

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

GA Review

[edit]
GA toolbox
Reviewing

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer:Legolas (talk2me) 13:02, 3 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Stating review...Legolas (talk2me) 07:39, 4 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Not much to do.


What specifically needs to be added? WesleyDodds (talk) 05:10, 10 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
{{album cover fur}}. — Legolas (talk2me) 05:55, 10 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Looking at the free-use rationale guidelines, it's clear that that template is optional and that a prose rationale is fine. Is there any specific information that is required that is missing from the current FUR on the page? WesleyDodds (talk) 06:16, 10 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  • The chord progression needs en-dash in between the chords
Fixed. WesleyDodds (talk) 05:08, 10 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  • File:PixiesHereComesYourMan.ogg --> Not exactly happy with the FUR. You need to tighten it to reflect what exactly is being discussed that the sound file will assist the reader in understanding.
  • References: For the magazine references, you need to have more details, volume, issue, issn, location, oublisher etc.
These are not mandatory per citation guidelines. WesleyDodds (talk) 04:58, 10 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
They are not mandatory, but should be added where its available. ISSNs are easily available and I suggest you add them, it helps in locating the resource better. — Legolas (talk2me) 05:55, 10 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
This information is not mandatory because the material cited is verifiable using the basic information provided (author, publication date, title, etc.). In the countless Feature Article Candidates and Review discussions I've participated in, it's been clear that this is all that's required for magazine article references. WesleyDodds (talk) 06:09, 10 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  • The page ranges need en-dash.
Fixed. WesleyDodds (talk) 05:03, 10 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The reference is the primary source (the record itself), and cite templates aren't required (and they would be at odds with the established citation style of the article). WesleyDodds (talk) 04:58, 10 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Fair enough. — Legolas (talk2me) 05:55, 10 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

On hold. — Legolas (talk2me) 16:41, 4 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I formatted two references using {{cite web}} and {{cite journal}}. I would advice you to use the templates, but take your call on it. I also corrected a redirect and there seems to no other issues at present. Passing this. — Legolas (talk2me) 12:28, 10 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]