Talk:Herb Pennock

Herb Pennock has been listed as one of the Sports and recreation good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Review: December 20, 2013. (Reviewed version).

A fact from Herb Pennock appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 7 October 2012 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:

Did you know... that Baseball Hall of Fame manager Connie Mack said that selling Herb Pennock was his greatest mistake?

A record of the entry may be seen at Wikipedia:Recent additions/2012/October. The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Herb Pennock.

Wikipedia

Biography: Sports and Games

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
	Sports portal This article is supported by the sports and games work group (assessed as Mid-importance).

Baseball: Hall of Fame / Red Sox / Yankees / Phillies High‑importance

	Baseball portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Baseball, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of baseball on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.BaseballWikipedia:WikiProject BaseballTemplate:WikiProject BaseballBaseball articles
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the Hall of Fame task force.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Boston Red Sox (assessed as Mid-importance).
	This article is supported by WikiProject New York Yankees (assessed as High-importance).
	This article is supported by WikiProject Philadelphia Phillies.

Pennsylvania Low‑importance

	Pennsylvania portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Pennsylvania, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Pennsylvania on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PennsylvaniaWikipedia:WikiProject PennsylvaniaTemplate:WikiProject PennsylvaniaPennsylvania articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Christianity: Quakers Low‑importance

	Christianity portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Christianity, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Christianity on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ChristianityWikipedia:WikiProject ChristianityTemplate:WikiProject ChristianityChristianity articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Religious Society of Friends (Quakers).

New York City Mid‑importance

	New York City portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject New York City, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of New York City-related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.New York CityWikipedia:WikiProject New York CityTemplate:WikiProject New York CityNew York City articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

GA Review

This review is transcluded from Talk:Herb Pennock/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: TonyTheTiger (talk · contribs) 04:50, 4 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I'll do this review.--TonyTheTiger (T / C / WP:FOUR / WP:CHICAGO / WP:WAWARD) 04:50, 4 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Philadelphia Athletics

~~"While pitching at Cedarcroft, Pennock threw a no-hitter to Earle Mack," - add the word catcher to this phrase.~~--TonyTheTiger (T / C / WP:FOUR / WP:CHICAGO / WP:WAWARD) 05:09, 4 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Done. – Muboshgu (talk) 01:47, 5 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]
~~Do you know what the waiver price was at the time?~~--TonyTheTiger (T / C / WP:FOUR / WP:CHICAGO / WP:WAWARD) 05:09, 4 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- $2,500. Added. – Muboshgu (talk) 01:47, 5 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Try and work in team season articles for the readers. May 14 with the Athletics could pipe to 1912 Philadelphia Athletics season, 1914 Athletics, Braves and Red Sox.
- Added – Muboshgu (talk) 21:12, 9 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  - The way you have them piped now, they are WP:EASTEREGG. The context of the sentence would lead the reader to believe they are MLB seasons, which would not be bad to pipe. The team season articles should be piped to the team name when it is useful. In this case, the text following the world series is about two specific teams rather than franchises. Most of the team season that you piped in are not natural. I am not just asking you to pipe these. The reader may want to know which teams were playing in that World Series.--TonyTheTiger (T / C / WP:FOUR / WP:CHICAGO / WP:WAWARD) 03:04, 10 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]
    - I'm trying to rework them. But, I think having a link say "Pittsburgh Pirates", for instance, should go to Pittsburgh Pirates, and not the season in question, because to me, that is an easter egg. – Muboshgu (talk) 20:51, 11 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]
      - If you sign a multiyear contract with the Pirates it should go to the team article because you are signing with the franchise. However, the world series is not played between franchises, but between particular teams described in team season articles. The context is all a judgement call.--TonyTheTiger (T / C / WP:FOUR / WP:CHICAGO / WP:WAWARD) 22:25, 11 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]
        How's this: "The [[1927 New York Yankees season|1927 Yankees]] reached the World Series, facing the [[1927 Pittsburgh Pirates season|1927 Pittsburgh Pirates]]."? – Muboshgu (talk) 19:48, 13 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]
        People are going to be edit warring to remove the redundant years unless we do this right. I think leaving the year unpiped for both teams and the World Series is a bit much. You have several other years to do where specific teams are being discussed. I.e., the following year three teams should have articles. I don't think we want to see the year that many times. Open for discussion though.--TonyTheTiger (T / C / WP:FOUR / WP:CHICAGO / WP:WAWARD) 20:03, 13 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]
        I don't think we want to see the year that often either, but without it, it becomes an easter egg. When I see Pittsburgh Pirates, I expect it to be [[Pittsburgh Pirates]], not [[1927 Pittsburgh Pirates season|Pittsburgh Pirates]]. I'm not sure what the best method is here. – Muboshgu (talk) 20:24, 13 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]
        Let's get all the teams linked that should be and see what it looks like.--TonyTheTiger (T / C / WP:FOUR / WP:CHICAGO / WP:WAWARD) 21:29, 13 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]
        Re-piped. – Muboshgu (talk) 20:55, 19 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]
"On Opening Day, Pennock threw a one-hit complete game shutout against the Boston Red Sox." - you know the deal.--TonyTheTiger (T / C / WP:FOUR / WP:CHICAGO / WP:WAWARD) 23:48, 19 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Piped. – Muboshgu (talk) 19:35, 20 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Boston Red Sox

"loaned Pennock to the Providence Grays" - was there compensation for this loan?--TonyTheTiger (T / C / WP:FOUR / WP:CHICAGO / WP:WAWARD) 05:09, 4 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Not seeing anything on this yet. I'm still looking. – Muboshgu (talk) 01:47, 5 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Sources are just saying he was farmed out. Nothing about any compensation.[1] – Muboshgu (talk) 01:54, 5 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Team season articles here too.--TonyTheTiger (T / C / WP:FOUR / WP:CHICAGO / WP:WAWARD) 08:00, 5 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Added – Muboshgu (talk) 21:12, 9 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  - Again piping the team seasons to the season is confusing to the reader. They are more helpful by the World Series, IMO.--TonyTheTiger (T / C / WP:FOUR / WP:CHICAGO / WP:WAWARD) 03:12, 10 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

New York Yankees

Please work in Yankee team season articles as well as for WS opponents. These are some tremendously important Yankee teams that he played for.--TonyTheTiger (T / C / WP:FOUR / WP:CHICAGO / WP:WAWARD) 08:00, 5 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Added – Muboshgu (talk) 21:12, 9 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]
third left-handed pitcher (1st and 2nd?)--TonyTheTiger (T / C / WP:FOUR / WP:CHICAGO / WP:WAWARD) 08:00, 5 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Source doesn't say. According to this list, one is Eddie Plank and the second might be Eppa Rixey? Not sure. With the Google News Archive being shut down, it's harder for me to find anything. – Muboshgu (talk) 00:46, 10 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Post-playing career

~~convert $1 million.~~--TonyTheTiger (T / C / WP:FOUR / WP:CHICAGO / WP:WAWARD) 08:07, 5 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Done. – Muboshgu (talk) 20:24, 6 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]
~~Phillies and Brooklyn Dodgers should have team season articles piped.~~--TonyTheTiger (T / C / WP:FOUR / WP:CHICAGO / WP:WAWARD) 08:07, 5 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Added – Muboshgu (talk) 21:12, 9 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]
"Though the Yankees defeated the Cardinals in the 1928 World Series" one more.--TonyTheTiger (T / C / WP:FOUR / WP:CHICAGO / WP:WAWARD) 23:48, 19 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Piped. – Muboshgu (talk) 19:35, 20 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I am placing this on hold. I am confident that my concerns can be addressed.--TonyTheTiger (T / C / WP:FOUR / WP:CHICAGO / WP:WAWARD) 08:07, 5 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Good work! I am going to pass this now.--TonyTheTiger (T / C / WP:FOUR / WP:CHICAGO / WP:WAWARD) 22:01, 20 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Herb Pennock. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20060712215452/http://www.thedeadballera.com/Obits/Pennock.Herb.Obit.html to http://www.thedeadballera.com/Obits/Pennock.Herb.Obit.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 18:31, 15 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]