Talk:Her Majesty's Wizard

This article was nominated for deletion on 16 July 2010 (UTC). The result of the discussion was merge to A Wizard in Rhyme.

Novels: Fantasy Mid‑importance

	Novels portal This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Novels, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to novels, novellas, novelettes and short stories on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and contribute to the general Project discussion to talk over new ideas and suggestions.NovelsWikipedia:WikiProject NovelsTemplate:WikiProject Novelsnovel articles
Mid	This redirect has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This redirect is supported by Fantasy task force.

Articles for creation

	This redirect was reviewed by member(s) of WikiProject Articles for creation. The project works to allow users to contribute quality articles and media files to the encyclopedia and track their progress as they are developed. To participate, please visit the project page for more information.Articles for creationWikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creationTemplate:WikiProject Articles for creationAfC articles
	This redirect was accepted on 26 August 2007 by reviewer Graeme Bartlett (talk · contribs).

Insanity?

"Any student of Catholicism will quickly see their studies reflected in the lives and actions of the characters." Has Wikipedia been taken over by christians? This article needs to be seriously rewritten to adhere to quality standards. This is not a objective summary of the book. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 83.166.11.82 (talk) 07:06, 15 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Not notable?

This series is not Harry Potter which spawned movies, but it is a worthy endeavour at fantasy fiction, married with real-world literature and religion. Snowybeagle (talk) 03:05, 9 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Notability's guideline is too subjective and too narrowly interpreted. Many articles on fantasy novels such as Terry Brooks' Landover series could be considered as lacking references and notability under certain interpretation. Snowybeagle (talk) 02:40, 15 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

So you don't deny the article fails to meet the criteria, but instead claim the criteria are at fault? Incredible. 69.181.249.92 (talk) 14:42, 15 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

No intent to explain to IP addresses. Snowybeagle (talk) 20:27, 15 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Well then perhaps you'll explain to me. I'm an unrelated editor who found this edit war via WP:AIV. Please explain why this article is notable, and do not discriminate against IP contributors. elektrik SHOOS 07:26, 16 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Put in my reasons in AfD talkpage.Snowybeagle (talk) 15:27, 16 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]