Jump to content

Talk:Hepatitis E

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

start

[edit]

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

review

(on hold due to time consumed on different virus(outbreak))fr1sp2(w/ eng ver)--Ozzie10aaaa (talk) 14:10, 29 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

GA Review

[edit]
GA toolbox
Reviewing
This review is transcluded from Talk:Hepatitis E/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Casliber (talk · contribs) 20:29, 14 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]


I'll take a look. I will make straightforward changes as I go and jot queries below. Please revert if I accidentally change the meaning. Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 20:29, 14 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Cas Liber thank you--Ozzie10aaaa (talk) 20:50, 14 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • I'd link incubation period, zoonosis, capsid.
  • Convert centigrade to fahrenheit
  •  Done [1] and [2] placed in parenthesis
  • After a short prodromal phase symptoms lasting from days to weeks follow. - are there any symptoms in the prodromal phase? Also, "days to weeks" is a bit vague/noninformative for the reader
  •  Done agree have clarified the text in question per..."Hepatitis E". www.who.int. Retrieved 17 August 2019....an initial phase of mild fever, reduced appetite, nausea and vomiting
  • How long do/can chronic infections last?
  • per review....Kamar, Nassim; Izopet, Jacques; Dalton, Harry R. "Chronic Hepatitis E Virus Infection and Treatment". Journal of Clinical and Experimental Hepatology. 3 (2): 134–140. doi:10.1016/j.jceh.2013.05.003. ISSN 0973-6883. Retrieved 17 August 2019....chronic Hepatitis E can be diagnosed at 3 months however as to how long chronic Hepatitis E can last (according to this review) is not as obvious, "A few liver-transplant patients with chronic HEV infection were given a 3-month (n = 3) or a 12-month (n = 1) course of pegylated interferon (135 μg/week)", according to the author within the first year chronic Hepatitis E can cause complications. I therefore have inserted [3] the time to diagnosis of the chronic condition.Should you wish me to elaborate on how long the chronic condition can last (and almost invariably its potential for complications) then I will do so
  • For some of these reported conditions the relationship is tenuous, but for several neurological and blood conditions the relationship appears causal - do you mean the ones listed below? Or is this all and only some are causal?
  •  Done agree have added [4] per...Bazerbachi, Fateh; Haffar, Samir; Garg, Sushil K; Lake, John R. "Extra-hepatic manifestations associated with hepatitis E virus infection: a comprehensive review of the literature". Gastroenterology Report. 4 (1): 1–15. doi:10.1093/gastro/gov042. ISSN 2052-0034. Retrieved 17 August 2019.... "According to the available data, HEV infection appears to be strongly associated with acute pancreatitis, neurological disorders (with primarily dominant peripheral nerve involvement, most commonly manifested as Guillain-Barré syndrome, followed by neuralgic amyotrophy), hematological diseases (hemolytic anemia due to glucose phosphate dehydrogenase deficiency, and severe thrombocytopenia), glomerulonephritis, and mixed cryoglobulinemia. More data are needed to clarify whether an association exists with musculoskeletal or other immune-mediated manifestations"
  • As mentioned, the incubation period following exposure to the hepatitis E virus ranges from 3 to 8 weeks, with a mean of 40 days - you've already mentioned this, in fact teh mean should be at the top mention. I'd say something like, "The length of the incubation period means that/leads to..." or something
  •  Done agree have added[5]
  • The article has two different cooking temperatures and times...and one is more confident than the other...
  •  Done agree have added [6]
  • per "Hepatitis E Virus and Food | FAQ | Food Safety Authority of Ireland". www.fsai.ie. Retrieved 17 August 2019.... "suggested that 71oC for 20 minutes was needed to kill the virus completely. Other studies in various food matrices including pig liver, suggest that 71oC for 10 minutes or even 70oC for 5 minutes would be sufficient to kill the hepatitis E virus"...the source indicated different times for different temperatures
  • a solution could be to incorporate the text the source indicated different times for different temperatures (which it does)[7]
  •  Done have added[8]
  • Has the chinese vaccine been used outside China?
  • per [9] Chinese-HEV vaccine, clinical trials in the United States have started, however there has been no approval/license[10]
  • Also, if the Ugandan outbreak was the largest, it probably should be expanded a bit to give proper weighting. Also, was the vaccine used in any of these outbreaks?
  • Outbreaks of epidemic hepatitis E most commonly occur after heavy rainfalls and monsoons because of their disruption of water supplies - probably better to explain this a little more - i.e. contamination of drinking water with effluent (I guess). Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 22:29, 17 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Done agree have added with reference[12]
  • What is the rationale behind the para splits in Recent outbreaks section? The first one is the largest outbreak...but then you have an African and Asian one in the next para...aaand an African one in the last.
  • the events are set by order in which they occurred, first being 2007 [13] to the most recent 2019[14]should you feel the 'para splits' should be different I would change then to your suggestion (however as indicated in the answer below this one, the outbreak in Namibia has been updated, and therefore has more text)
  • An outbreak was reported in Namibia in southern Africa, in January 2018, the total infected is reported as 490 - is written like it was just added...and left. Needs to be reworded to fit with the next two sentences.
  •  Done have added with reference[16]
  • I just came across this article, which should be included - other salient facts - historically we used to call other viral hepatitises non-A non-B hepatitis. It also cites this paper, which seems to be about the discovery of the virus.

So yeah, finding out who called it Hep E and when and adding would be good....

  • The Webb article also states that Hep E is the most common cause of viral hepatitis worldwide. That should be included prominently if true.
WHO estimated that in 2016, approximately 399 000 people died from hepatitis C[21], while Hepatitis E caused approximately 44 000 deaths in 2015 [22]
The comparisons would be good to put in Viral hepatitis. Good to get some perspective on that...Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 23:00, 20 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • The Webb article also states in epidemiology "Young adults are most commonly affected, especially the 15–35 age group, and men are more likely to be infected than women" - not mentioned in this article.
  •  Done have added[23]
  • The Webb article also mentions renal complications
  • The Webb article also has a table "Who should we test for HEV?" - article lacks information on indications for testing..
  • article has a 'Diagnosis ' section which contains subsection 'Virological markers'
  •  Done have added with reference[24]
  • The Webb article gives 2-8 weeks as incubation period (vs article's 3-8 weeks. I'd take a review article over a fact sheet but might be good to figure out why there is a discrepancy and think of a rationale to go with one or the other.
  • The Webb article also discusses unanswered questions/dilemmas - I think this is fascinating and illustrates science as a work-in-progress and highlights the challenges i.e. the knowledge is by no means set in stone.
  • Ok, looking at the questions - they can be sprinkled into prose (I guess) next to the relevant discussions, such as "Other animal reservoirs are possible but unknown" , "The mechanism of neurological damage is unknown". , "The mechanism of/reason for its severity in pregnancy is unknown". Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 08:40, 21 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • I'll add the 3 you've indicated above, however as for the remaining 8 questions, inserting too much text that indicates 'unknown' might have a negative effect on how the article is viewed by readers...IMO--Ozzie10aaaa (talk) 09:05, 21 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

1. Well written?:

Prose quality:
Manual of Style compliance:

2. Factually accurate and verifiable?:

References to sources:
Citations to reliable sources, where required:
No original research:

3. Broad in coverage?:

Major aspects:
Focused:

4. Reflects a neutral point of view?:

Fair representation without bias:

5. Reasonably stable?

No edit wars, etc. (Vandalism does not count against GA):

6. Illustrated by images, when possible and appropriate?:

Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:
Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:


Overall:

Pass or Fail: Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 13:43, 22 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

For bonus points, the references need aligning to a consistent format. You have dates in both "1 Jan 1990" and "1990-01-01" in article. choose one and align others. Similarly authors - some are "Smith J, Jones B", others are "Smith, J.; Jones, B." - pick one format and align others.

thank you, will look... I used the citation bot and prior to my edit Dawnseeker2000 did this[29], not certain if that's enough, I did look hereHelp:Citation_tools (will take to DYK)--Ozzie10aaaa (talk) 15:02, 22 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Hepatitis_E&oldid=1193691264"