Talk:Henry Pering Pellew Crease
This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Henry Pering Pellew Crease has been listed as one of the Social sciences and society good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it. | ||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Biography assessment rating comment
[edit]The article may be improved by following the WikiProject Biography 11 easy steps to producing at least a B article. -- KenWalker | Talk 16:37, 10 June 2007 (UTC)
Followed the 11 steps, so let's see if it's good.Stevecudmore 03:28, 12 June 2007 (UTC)
Judge's Bench Book Notes of Hall Trial
[edit]These notes may have content useful for this article. --KenWalker | Talk 23:59, 14 June 2007 (UTC)
Failed GA nomination
[edit]My primary reasons for failing this GA nomination is because the article looks a bit short (I think you could write more about an Attorney General and Supreme Court justice), and also because there are a lack of in-line citations in the article. Please see WP:REF, and take a look at the referencing style of some other GA articles. Nishkid64 (talk) 17:05, 2 July 2007 (UTC)
Passed GA
[edit]Successful good article nomination
[edit]I am glad to say that this article which was nominated for good article status has succeeded. This is how the article, as of July 8, 2007, compares against the six good article criteria:
- 1. Well written?: Yes
- 2. Factually accurate?: Yes
- 3. Broad in coverage?: Yes
- 4. Neutral point of view?: Yes
- 5. Article stability? Yes
- 6. Images?: Yes
If you feel that this review is in error, feel free to take it to a GA review. Thank you to all of the editors who worked hard to bring it to this status. — bobanny 07:25, 8 July 2007 (UTC)
GA Sweeps (kept)
[edit]This article has been reviewed as part of Wikipedia:WikiProject Good articles/Project quality task force. I believe the article currently meets the criteria and should remain listed as a Good article. The article history has been updated to reflect this review. Regards, Ruslik 13:20, 19 October 2007 (UTC)
- GA-Class biography articles
- GA-Class biography (politics and government) articles
- Low-importance biography (politics and government) articles
- Politics and government work group articles
- WikiProject Biography articles
- GA-Class law articles
- Low-importance law articles
- WikiProject Law articles
- GA-Class Cornwall-related articles
- Low-importance Cornwall-related articles
- All WikiProject Cornwall pages
- GA-Class Canada-related articles
- Mid-importance Canada-related articles
- GA-Class British Columbia articles
- Mid-importance British Columbia articles
- GA-Class Political parties and politicians in Canada articles
- Mid-importance Political parties and politicians in Canada articles
- All WikiProject Canada pages
- GA-Class politics articles
- Low-importance politics articles
- WikiProject Politics articles
- Wikipedia good articles
- Social sciences and society good articles
- Wikipedia Did you know articles that are good articles