Talk:Henry H. Huson House and Water Tower

National Register of Historic Places Low‑importance

	National Register of Historic Places portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject National Register of Historic Places, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of U.S. historic sites listed on the National Register of Historic Places on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.National Register of Historic PlacesWikipedia:WikiProject National Register of Historic PlacesTemplate:WikiProject National Register of Historic PlacesNational Register of Historic Places articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Wisconsin Low‑importance

	Wisconsin portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Wisconsin, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the U.S. state of Wisconsin on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.WisconsinWikipedia:WikiProject WisconsinTemplate:WikiProject WisconsinWisconsin articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Two part name

Hudson's house is now a bed & breakfast which was for sale when I took the pictures on July 1. Across the street from the house is his personal water tower, which was discontinued after a city water system was created. I took a picture of the RHP sign description by the water tower if you want me to upload it. Royal broil 05:22, 16 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Based on your talk page reply, it is Huson not Hudson then, so this article is named okay. I wonder why the B&B is named Gilbert Huson House, while the RHP is Henry H. Huson House. I see that your pic and B&B pics are of the same place. I wonder, to get a good pic of the house do you have to wait until the leaves come off the trees. doncram (talk) 13:20, 16 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

About uploading the RHP sign, especially now that I see it is cited as a source in the article, it seems very relevant to include a pic of it. I think it would add. I should mention that there's a chance that a plaque pic would get deleted, as there has been some controversy about pics of plaques: someone has argued that they are copyrighted and that you would have to get explicit permission to use a picture, and deleted a bunch of NRHP plaque pics a while back. doncram (talk) 13:25, 16 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]