Talk:Henderson Gleaner

Newspapers Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Newspapers, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Newspapers on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.NewspapersWikipedia:WikiProject NewspapersTemplate:WikiProject NewspapersNewspapers articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Journalism Low‑importance

	Journalism portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Journalism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of journalism on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.JournalismWikipedia:WikiProject JournalismTemplate:WikiProject JournalismJournalism articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

United States: Kentucky Low‑importance

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	Kentucky portal This article is supported by WikiProject Kentucky (assessed as Low-importance).

Merger with The Gleaner newspaper (Henderson, Kentucky)

We definitely don't need two articles on this. Which is the official name of the paper? Acdixon 14:28, 18 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

My apologies. I am the author of each article, and I agree Wikipedia doesn't need two articles on this. The first -- The Gleaner newspaper (Henderson, Kentucky) -- was recommended for deletion on the basis of it being a text dump. I created the second article -- Henderson Gleaner -- later and have added extensive internal links. I would recommend deleting "The Gleaner newspaper (Henderson, Kentucky)" article and keeping "Henderson Gleaner." As for the official name of the paper: Its masthead or flag reads "The Gleaner." However, there is also a Gleaner newspaper in Kingston, Jamaica, and there are number of existing Wiki articles that reference "Henderson Gleaner." Chuckipedia 14:42, 18 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Henderson Gleaner. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20061004101948/http://www.ap.org/pages/about/pulitzer/list.html to http://www.ap.org/pages/about/pulitzer/list.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 00:21, 2 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]