Talk:Hemipholiota
 | This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
| |||||||||||
This is a good genus for the type species and it needs a distinct page. I may do this later. Heliocybe (talk) 14:27, 20 September 2014 (UTC)
- I whipped up a stub for this, but am confused about what the type species is (IF and MycoBank are contradictory (Hemipholiota populnea v. Hemipholiota albocrenulata); Singer 1962 has Pholiota destruens ...?). Sasata (talk) 17:17, 20 September 2014 (UTC)
Interesting - I think Mycobank got it wrong but I will double check. Thanks for starting it.Heliocybe (talk) 23:26, 20 September 2014 (UTC) Yes, if you look at the link to the protologue in Sydowia you`ll see that the subgenus has Pholiota destruens as type, but for a section within the subgenus, there is another type, Pholiota albocrenulat which is the type of Hemistropharia. Mycobank is wrong.Heliocybe (talk) 23:33, 20 September 2014 (UTC)