Talk:Hellingly Hospital Railway/GA1

GA Review

GA review (see here for criteria)

It is reasonably well written.
a (prose): b (MoS):
The lead needs to be expanded. Also, the prose is very choppy. You mightwant to combine some of the paragraphs and remove some of the subheaders.
It is factually accurate and verifiable.
a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
It is broad in its coverage.
a (major aspects): b (focused):
It follows the neutral point of view policy.
Fair representation without bias:
It is stable.
No edit wars etc.:
It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
Overall:
Pass/Fail:

It's a decent article, but it needs some work before GA. I've put the article on-hold to allow for these issues to be addressed. Cheers, Juliancolton ^Tropical ^Cyclone 13:44, 20 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I copyedited the article in full, and expanded the lead. Thanks for taking a look! giggy _(:O) 14:36, 20 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks to the pair of you... You may be seeing this again fairly soon, as I think it's going to be restructured & rewritten. – iridescent 15:49, 20 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]