Talk:Hellenistic armies

Greece Mid‑importance

	Greece portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Greece, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Greece on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.GreeceWikipedia:WikiProject GreeceTemplate:WikiProject GreeceGreek articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Military history: Classical C‑class

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles

C

This article has been rated as C-class on the project's quality scale.

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion not met Coverage and accuracy: criterion met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion met

Associated task forces:
/
	Classical warfare task force (c. 700 BC – c. 500 AD)

Classical Greece and Rome High‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Classical Greece and Rome, a group of contributors interested in Wikipedia's articles on classics. If you would like to join the WikiProject or learn how to contribute, please see our project page. If you need assistance from a classicist, please see our talk page.Classical Greece and RomeWikipedia:WikiProject Classical Greece and RomeTemplate:WikiProject Classical Greece and RomeClassical Greece and Rome articles
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

Untitled

Can someone correct an error on this page. In the section on elephants it states that the Asian elephant was much smaller than the African. This is true nowadays but wasn't in ancient times. The modern (large) African elephant cannot be tamed easily and has very rarely been used as a work beast or for war. In ancient time a subspecies of the forest elephant was used. This subspecies is now extinct but was smaller than the Asian elephant. There are quite a few sources for this, both modern and ancient.

Where are you planning to go with this article?

I'm imagining it will end up being very very long once it is all filled out. Mathmo ^Talk 10:45, 29 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Mathmo. I planned the article but still didn't have any spare time to write it. I intend to write it down in the next few days. And it will be quite long. I'll be glad to get some help along the way. Nik Sage ^Talk 06:40, 31 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Generalizations/inaccuracies?

A few things I noticed...

I would change the description of the phalangite's shield to what the archaeological evidence has provided us with: a 2ft-diameter shield, much flatter than the hoplite's aspis, with a wooden core and a (typically) bronze face. Adjectives aside, such a shield can cover a 5'8" man of average build from shoulder-tip to shoulder-tip and from chin to groin standing up, and probably more so when in the 3/4 profile/leaning stance of the phalangite with his sarissa at the ready.

I don't know of any "bucklers" used by phalangites, except where some historians have chosen to refer to the phalangite shield as such. It is, in my humble opinion, an inaccurate and not-useful term that denotes something much smaller. Same for terms like "knife" or "dagger" when describing the phalangite's sword. Whether a kopis, falcatta, or xiphos, we're talking about a roughly 2ft-long weapon only slightly smaller than the gladius the Romans used.

Also, I'm not sure the description of the phalanx being defenseless from the rear is very accurate, the basic building block of the phalanx--the 256-man syntagma or spheira--would suffer from such weaknesses, but the full formation? Not necessarily. Appian, in his description of the Syrian Wars, specifically points to Antiochus' phalanx as forming a square and resisting all attacks by the Romans while retreating in good order. It was only wrecked when the Romans directed their missiles at the elephants within the square itself.

Anyways, do these merit an edit by the original drafter, or should I input them?

Phoebus Americanos (talk) 14:14, 20 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

general shape up attempt

I am endeavoring in the next days a general shape up of the article. Please, instead of reverting anything you don't like, pose any questions, objections or source inquiries here and I will address them all. If you feel you have to add something or are really certain that I have made a mistake, then go ahead and change things, but do not delete the whole edits. Thanks!

GK1973 (talk) 01:25, 4 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Tarentinic Circle

I saw that this was added in the article. Any ancient sources mentioning the form of skirmishing tactic the Tarentines employed? I also believe they probably rode in circles as is the case with the Cantabrian Circle described by Arrian but I have no reference in mind regarding any "Tarentinic Circle". GK1973 (talk) 14:35, 7 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Roman influence on Hellenistic warfare

Can someone add a reference to the fact it is hypothesized that such troops where in fact Thureophoroi and Thorakitai.

Obviously not as a fact, merely it's been suggested this was the case. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 81.108.169.232 (talk) 14:31, 1 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Was it 22' at the nadir or the zenith of development?

Seems to me the greatest length would be the high point of development, the zenith, rather than the lowest point, the nadir.

Cmarkn (talk) 11:28, 20 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Hellenistic armies. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20060524231924/http://wildfiregames.com/0ad/page.php?p=1568 to http://wildfiregames.com/0ad/page.php?p=1568

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 18:52, 1 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]