Talk:Hellenion

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Lists, an attempt to structure and organize all list pages on Wikipedia. If you wish to help, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.ListsWikipedia:WikiProject ListsTemplate:WikiProject ListsList articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Classical Greece and Rome Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Classical Greece and Rome, a group of contributors interested in Wikipedia's articles on classics. If you would like to join the WikiProject or learn how to contribute, please see our project page. If you need assistance from a classicist, please see our talk page.Classical Greece and RomeWikipedia:WikiProject Classical Greece and RomeTemplate:WikiProject Classical Greece and RomeClassical Greece and Rome articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Greece Low‑importance

	Greece portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Greece, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Greece on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.GreeceWikipedia:WikiProject GreeceTemplate:WikiProject GreeceGreek articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Andrew Campbell & Hellenion

As I understand it, Andrew Campbell was not a founding member of Hellenion. Do we have a cited source for this information? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 151.201.149.33 (talk) 14:27, 1 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

No, I don't believe we do. In investigating that, I have just discovered that this is apparently not an entirely uncontroversial claim. I'm removing the clause for now, until a source can be found that sheds some light on the issue. - AdelaMae ^{(t - c - wpn)} 14:46, 2 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

General Notability

I do not believe Hellenion meets the Primary criterion for notability:

A company, corporation, organization, team, religion, group, product, or service is notable if it has been the subject of coverage in secondary sources. Such sources must be reliable, and independent of the subject. The depth of coverage of the subject by the source must be considered. If the depth of coverage is not substantial, then multiple independent sources should be cited to establish notability. Trivial or incidental coverage of a subject by secondary sources is not sufficient to establish notability. Once notability is established, primary sources may be used to add content. Ultimately, and most importantly, all content must be attributable.

There is only one secondary source listed, and it is not one that could be considered substantial. Multiple additional independent sources would be needed, and as stated in policy, "Trivial or incidental coverage of a subject by secondary sources is not sufficient to establish notability." --151.201.147.150 (talk) 02:11, 9 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I agree. Probably not notable enough for its own article. dab (𒁳) 13:49, 13 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I am going to propose that this article be deleted. --151.201.147.150 (talk) 14:29, 14 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Catalographer has added more sources, but do any of them really go beyond "trivial or incidental coverage"? --151.201.147.150 (talk) 19:36, 14 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

moved to Hellenion (USA)

from Hellenion Catalographer (talk) 20:03, 14 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Assessment comment

The comment(s) below were originally left at Talk:Hellenion/Comments, and are posted here for posterity. Following several discussions in past years, these subpages are now deprecated. The comments may be irrelevant or outdated; if so, please feel free to remove this section.

Tagged as stub, lacks independent sources. - AdelaMae ^{(t - c - wpn)} 16:42, 5 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Last edited at 16:42, 5 January 2007 (UTC). Substituted at 20:01, 1 May 2016 (UTC)