Talk:Heligmini
 | This redirect does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
| |||||||||||
What should happen here?
[edit]@Photocyte:, I'm not sure what you're going for. If Heligmini is considered a synonym of Cleidecostina, the article could be moved to the latter title (although it would need to be rewritten to emphasize the current subtribe status rather than previous tribal status). If you want separate articles on Cleidecostina and Heligmini as previously circumscribed, that's OK (although I'm not sure it's necessary). At any rate, the taxon shown in the taxobox should be the same as the title of the article (unless the article is titled with a vernacular name, or is about a monotypic taxon). Plantdrew (talk) 21:10, 29 November 2018 (UTC)
@Plantdrew: I get what you mean. I'll have to review the literature and get back to this, possible refactoring across several pages.Photocyte (talk) 21:25, 29 November 2018 (UTC)