Talk:Helen Taylor (feminist)
Appearance
This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Requested move
[edit]- The following discussion is an archived discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the move request was: not moved. No consensus that this is the primary topic. -- BrownHairedGirl (talk) • (contribs) 11:36, 3 March 2014 (UTC)
Helen Taylor (feminist) → Helen Taylor – This person had some significant achievements in her lifetime. The only other person of this name, Lady Helen Taylor, is a minor relation of British royalty only just above the threshold of notability, although she should still be dealt with by a hatnote. PatGallacher (talk) 22:24, 22 February 2014 (UTC)
- Support DNB, GB. In ictu oculi (talk) 09:43, 23 February 2014 (UTC)
- Oppose. I don't really see any primary topic here. -- Necrothesp (talk) 22:57, 26 February 2014 (UTC)
- Support Superfluous disambiguation and redirect, the minor royal relative is disambiguated by her title "Lady". Hat note to be added to both articles. walk victor falk talk 15:57, 28 February 2014 (UTC)
- Oppose. The Lady Helen article is almost 10 times more visited than the is article (13381 vs 1470 over the last 90 days). Clearly this article is not the WP:PRIMARYTOPIC by the measure of usage. Tassedethe (talk) 01:56, 1 March 2014 (UTC)
- Oppose Not the primary topic per Tassedethe. Armbrust The Homunculus 00:12, 2 March 2014 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.