This article was nominated for deletion on 27 February 2014 (UTC). The result of the discussion was keep.
This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourcedmust be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.
This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women scientists, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Women in science on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Women scientistsWikipedia:WikiProject Women scientistsTemplate:WikiProject Women scientistsWomen scientists articles
You should not, only the closing admin can do that: removing AFD tags is regarded as vandalism... What you should do is go to the AFD discussion (linked in the tag) and participate in the discussion. In any case, I don't think that keeping the article is going to be any problem as this person is clearly notable. To restore the AFD tag, I had to undo several of your edits. Some more advice, therefore: if you want to list some publications of her, please restrict yourself to the most notable ones, generally 3, in extreme cases 5 (and in very extreme cases, like Albert Einstein, all of them...) . In addition, it helps readers if the references are as complete as possible (i.e., including journal names, volume numbers, etc. See {{cite journal}} for more information). --Randykitty (talk) 15:45, 3 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Wikipedia:External links"External links in an article can be helpful to the reader, but they should be kept minimal, meritable, and directly relevant to the article."
@Randy: Could you elaborate which of the external links you consider : not helpful not meritable or not directly relevant to the article? Thank you!--Christophe (talk) 16:47, 6 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]
External links are fine (up to a point) at the end of an article in a separate section. They are not fine in the main body (doubly so in case there is already an article on them, like The Endocrine Society). The tag is therefore completely justified. next time, before removing a maintenance tag, you'd better ask first before removing it. Thanks. --Randykitty (talk) 16:52, 6 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]
