Jump to content

Talk:Hedonic regression

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Untitled

[edit]

This page needs a more general approach. Specifically end of this page focuses on real estate, but hedonic regression is actually a very general method.ValtteriRyhtilä (talk) 16:11, 9 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I'd like to see a defense of hedonics in here; while I am fairly familiar with the criticisms (I hang out and argue with Austrians, Libertarians, goldbugs, etc., on financial boards) I am not as familiar with the defenses. Shawn Pickrell 12:22, 8 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I don't see much of the defenses or criticisms here. A single, poorly described criticism was levied then effectively erased by saying it was shown to be not true, (with a source that does not appear to support such a statement). 24.21.222.121 (talk) 23:59, 12 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

In recent years there has been an unfortunate tendency among authors and publishers to substitute spell checkers for proof readers and copy editors. A spellchecker cannot point out a correctly spelled word that is meaningless in the context, it cannot tell when a word, e.g. an article, is accidentally written twice. It cannot correct syntax errors. It cannot compensate for missing words. It slows down my reading speed tremendously and is very irritating.

In other words, productivity went up and quality went down. It's utter non-sense in my opinion (and I do not belong to the Austrian School). So just like in traditional measures of inflation we are not talking about the same product and therefore still face the same problem. Funny thing, Greenspan who got a lot of mileage out of this emphasized the increase in quality. (Perhaps he couldn't conceive of quality - like house prices - going down.)

Furthermore, while IT increases productivity in many ways, it does not speed up the typing speed of the person entering data.

It was politically motivated in order to decrease social security payments etc which are indexed to inflation. I do not deny that measuring inflation especially over long time periods has its problems. But even in a static sense it has many problems and the official inflation rate does not apply to all people, or even all sectors of an economy. If rents and food prices, for example, rise much faster than the official rate of inflation the rate of inflation applicable to them is higher than the CPI. The supporters of this theory only decrease the rate of inflation, i.e. increase the value of GDP. In the traditional way decreases (i.e. deflation) are possible.

What I find most troubling is that there is alleged to be income without an increase in product. National income and national product are equal by definition, just like debits equal credits in bookkeeping.

If national product is understated - as the supporters of hedonics allege - where did the corresponding income go? With traditional measures of inflation the equation of income and product is preserved.

I've been hesitant for a long time to start such a discussion. So please show me where I went wrong if you disagree with my reasoning.

Gatorinvancouver (talk) 04:15, 9 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Hedonic regression. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 00:54, 31 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Hedonic regression. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 06:54, 1 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]


[edit]

This article has been revised as part of a large-scale clean-up project of multiple article copyright infringement. (See the investigation subpage) Earlier text must not be restored, unless it can be verified to be free of infringement. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions must be deleted. Contributors may use sources as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously. MER-C 10:34, 12 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

India Education Program course assignment

[edit]

This article was the subject of an educational assignment supported by Wikipedia Ambassadors through the India Education Program.

The above message was substituted from {{IEP assignment}} by PrimeBOT (talk) on 20:02, 1 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Hedonic_regression&oldid=1201780830"