Talk:Hedonic hunger/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Gug01 (talk · contribs)

Obvious/major mistakes/errors

There are no large mistakes/errors. There are no {{POW}} or {{unreferenced}} tags, etc.

References

There is a sufficient number of references and they are reliable sources.

Spelling, grammar, punctuation and capitalization

This article is well-written and does not contain any spelling, grammar, punctuation or capitalization issues.

Article content: plagiarism, content/comprehensiveness and image use policies

There is no plagiarism and the images are correctly licensed. The content broadly covers the subject but doesn't go into great detail except where needed.

Stability and point of view

This article is very stable, with no edit wars in all of its history, and is written from a neutral point of view. Gug01 (talk) 21:22, 1 January 2015 (UTC) Gug 01[reply]

Overview in all

This article is stable, well-referenced, and in general perfect to be a good article. The lead is very short and summarizing, and the article is informative, accessible, of a reasonable length and understandable to everybody. Gug01 (talk) 21:22, 1 January 2015 (UTC) Gug 01[reply]