Talk:Hedgewar Smruti Mandir

Hedgewar Smruti Mandir was a Geography and places good articles nominee, but did not meet the good article criteria at the time. There may be suggestions below for improving the article. Once these issues have been addressed, the article can be renominated. Editors may also seek a reassessment of the decision if they believe there was a mistake.

Article milestones
Date	Process	Result
October 30, 2018	Good article nominee	Not listed

A fact from this article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the "Did you know?" column on June 20, 2018.

The text of the entry was: Did you know ... that Hedgewar Smruti Mandir is a memorial to K. B. Hedgewar, the founder of the Hindutva organization Rashtriya Swayamsevak Sangh?

India: Maharashtra / History Low‑importance

	India portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject India, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of India-related topics. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page.IndiaWikipedia:WikiProject IndiaTemplate:WikiProject IndiaIndia articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Maharashtra (assessed as Low-importance).
	This article is supported by the Indian history workgroup (assessed as Low-importance).
	This article was last assessed in May 2018.

GA Review

This review is transcluded from Talk:Hedgewar Smruti Mandir/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Lordgilman (talk · contribs) 20:18, 30 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Failed "good article" nomination

This article has failed its Good article nomination. This is how the article, as of October 30, 2018, compares against the six good article criteria:

1. Well written?: The prose here is a bit choppy and short. If more research can be done you'll have more to write about and be able to turn it into more of a narrative.

2. Verifiable?: Looks good to me

3. Broad in coverage?: More information on the memorial itself would be good, the construction, art, etc. This article is all about the process that created the memorial and there is nothing about the memorial itself in this article.

4. Neutral point of view?: Good

5. Stable?: Good

6. Images?: Where are the pictures? It's a memorial, you need to have pictures of it for the article to be complete/good! I would be strongly opposed to GA status for this until some pictures can be found.

"but this is a controversial decision and has been contested" This sentence needs to be reworked as that quoted bit is repetitive given the subsection that it's in

When these issues are addressed, the article can be renominated. If you feel that this review is in error, feel free to have it reassessed. Thank you for your work so far.— Lordgilman (talk) 20:18, 30 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]