Talk:Heavy Weather (film)

	Film portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Film. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see lists of open tasks and regional and topical task forces. To use this banner, please refer to the documentation. To improve this article, please refer to the guidelines.FilmWikipedia:WikiProject FilmTemplate:WikiProject Filmfilm articles
	This article is supported by the British cinema task force.

BBC Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject BBC, an attempt to better organise information in articles related to the BBC. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page where you can join us as a member. You can also visit the BBC Portal.BBCWikipedia:WikiProject BBCTemplate:WikiProject BBCBBC articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Tasks for WikiProject BBC:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

Article requests : Improve BBC, BBC News (TV channel) and BBC News to Good Article status following previous reviews, create BBC Computer Literacy Project (in light of forthcoming 30th anniversary)
Cleanup : Chucklevision - references and general clean-up, Pebble Mill Studios - over-detailed and long, BBC World Service Television - unreferenced and confusing
Copyedit : BBC News, Broadcasting House
Expand : Top 20 start-class BBC articles with most importance: BBC Japan, BBC World Service Television, BBC Lifestyle, BBC Two Northern Ireland
NPOV : Criticism of the BBC (See comments)
Stubs : Stub-Class BBC articles
Other : *Restructure the category
- Add infoboxes to the BBC articles without infoboxes
- Add free-use images to biographical articles where possible
- Add references to Goa Mix (see assessment) and Coat of arms of the BBC
- Return Dad's Army to a Good article. (See comments)
- Reassess BBC following improvements to article.

Fair use rationale for Image:O'Toole - Blandings (2).jpg

Image:O'Toole - Blandings (2).jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot 10:02, 7 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Tone of this article

Much of this article seems to have little or nothing to do with this production of Heavy Weather. Major cleanup is in order and unless there is some objection, I will go at it with a weed whacker at some point. Rhindle The Red (talk) 03:20, 30 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Disagree. Personally I think there's lots of good stuff here. I should apply your whacker elsewhere. Sentorian (talk) 21:18, 16 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

No, he/she is quite correct - this reads like an amateur essay by a wannabe TV critic, rambling on about stuff that's got nothing to do with the topic. This is an encyclopedia article, you know. I'm whacking away! - DavidWBrooks (talk)

Well, actually, I think you've done quite a good job, keeping most of the useful stuff. Sentorian (talk) 06:11, 25 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not arguing that the information isn't valid, just that it doesn't belong here, on a page about this specific TV adaptation. Anything not already at Blandings Castle needs to move there and the entire "Blandings on film and television" section needs to go. If you can't make a case for what this section has to do with the *topic at hand*, I will cut it. Rhindle The Red (talk) 14:16, 30 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Title

Shouldn't it be "Heavy Weather (TV film)"? --STUART (talk) 17:03, 10 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]