Jump to content

Talk:Heavy Crown (song)/GA2

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

GA Review

[edit]
GA toolbox
Reviewing

Reviewer: Carbrera (talk · contribs) 01:57, 3 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I am Carbrera, and I'll be reviewing this article for possible good article submission.

Full review coming very soon. Carbrera (talk) 01:57, 3 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Infobox

[edit]
  • Shouldn't a release date be included in here? Including the date of the reissued album would be fine by me
  •  Done
  • I don't know how it's exactly credited in the liner notes, but would you credit The Invisible Men as writers, or the three men that make up the trio?
  • I'm inclined to credit them as the trio, like how it's presented in the liner notes of the album. The same way that I've credited 'Iggy Azalea', not 'Amythest Kelly'.

Lead

[edit]
  • I didn't find any mistakes, but could the lead be broken into two smaller paragraphs? It's matter of personal preference I guess
  •  Done

Background

[edit]
  • The first sentence's use of 'which' sounds a bit redundant; could this possibly be reworded?
  •  Done
  • You could remove 'also' in the sentence that begins with: "On 14 November..."
  •  Done

Composition

[edit]

Looks very good to me; nothing to change here :)

Critical reception

[edit]

Paragraph 2

[edit]
  • Would you link Idolator here? Probably not, since it was linked in the composition section...
  • Yeah, I'm a one link-per article kinda editor.

References

[edit]

I double checked each source to see if any had the overlinking (like you mentioned on Baby Don't Lie's article) and everything looked fantastic

  • Thankyou!

GA

[edit]

GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria

  1. Is it reasonably well written?
    A. Prose quality:
    B. MoS compliance:
  2. Is it factually accurate and verifiable?
    A. References to sources:
    B. Citation of reliable sources where necessary:
    C. No original research:
  3. Is it broad in its coverage?
    A. Major aspects:
    B. Focused:
  4. Is it neutral?
    Fair representation without bias:
  5. Is it stable?
    No edit wars, etc:
  6. Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
    A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:
    B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:
  7. Overall:
    Pass or Fail: Put on hold

End of GA Review:

[edit]

I definitely think this article should pass GA; I don't see anything wrong with it. You've outdone yourself on this article, but I would like you to see what I had to say before passing it. Thanks, Carbrera (talk) 23:26, 4 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]