Talk:Heather Langenkamp/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Some Dude From North Carolina (talk · contribs) 12:53, 24 March 2021 (UTC)

Hey, I'm going to be reviewing this article. Expect comments by the end of the week. Some Dude From North Carolina (talk) 12:53, 24 March 2021 (UTC)

Infobox and lead

• Infobox looks good.
• "lowbudget" → "low-budget"
• "Award–winning" → "Award-winning" (dashes)

Early life

• This section looks good.

Career

• The sentence ending with "attack" is unsourced.
• "low budget" → "low-budget"
• You can't cite IMDb after "previous attempts" per WP:IMDB. Find a replacement.

Personal life

• "of brain tumor" → "of a brain tumor"

Filmography

• Per consistency with other GA-articles, every single one of her projects needs a source for verification.

Awards and nominations

• Same thing with this section (sources are needed for each award).

References

• Archive all archivable (either manually or with this tool).
• Check for sources in this article from Google Books, because most of them are missing page numbers.
• The reference after "1982" is a bare link.
• The references after "youngest housewife" and "Variety Series" should not be in all caps per MOS:ALLCAPS.
• Mark references from The New York Times with "|url-access=limited".
• Mark references from Los Angeles Times with "|url-access=limited".
• People.com → People
• Overall, a lot of references are missing several parameters (authors/dates/access-dates/websites) and just look bad, so try fixing them.

Progress

GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)
It is reasonably well written. a (prose, spelling, and grammar): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists): It is factually accurate and verifiable. a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR): d (copyvio and plagiarism): It is broad in its coverage. a (major aspects): b (focused): It follows the neutral point of view policy. Fair representation without bias: It is stable. No edit wars, etc.: It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate. a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
Overall: Pass/Fail:
· · ·

Comments

• Pinging the nominator, @The Baudelaire Fortune, to tell them they have only a few days (until the end of April 3), to add comments and/or address the suggestions listed above, or I will have to fail the article due to an inactive nominator. If this is the case, don't be discouraged, and feel free to nominate the article again when you have time. If you reply, please ping me so I receive a notification of your response. Some Dude From North Carolina (talk) 22:10, 2 April 2021 (UTC)

• Failing the article due to inactive nominator. Don't be discouraged, and feel free to nominate the article again. Some Dude From North Carolina (talk) 13:00, 5 April 2021 (UTC)