Talk:Heat and Micronutrient Cultivation in Perennial Chickpea Species

Great work and great reviews! Please follow the suggestions below especially regarding the references. Each unique article gets a single number - and you can refer to that number multiple times throughout the article. Let me know if you have any questions! --Amille75 (talk) 05:17, 7 December 2015 (UTC)

Great job on your contribution! Here are some additional comments:

1. You did a good job of using multiple sources and citing them properly.

2. I did notice, that you cited the same article twice (reference number 3 and 4 both correspond to the same article). You should be able to reference the same source again without using another number. This would help clean up your list of references.

3. I liked how you set the first sentence apart from the rest of the article. I thought this served as a good introduction/preview to what you will be addressing in the rest of your article.

4. A suggestion I have is to divide up the rest of your article into additional paragraphs instead of the one paragraph you currently have. I think this would help make it easier to read and follow.

5. I thought your article was very information and easy to follow in terms of content. You also did not have any grammatical mistakes.

Hope this helps!

I really enjoyed reading your article! Some things you can fix:

1. I really liked how you were very direct on what material you wanted to talk about and focused on that. 2. Like the person above, you cited one of the articles twice. The format of the citations look fine. 3. I liked how you talked about what you can do to benefit more from the chickpea such as increasing heat would increase protein content. 4. I would also try to split the article up and add subsections so it flows better. A suggestion is maybe you can add where the chickpea could be found geographically. Where does it primarily grow? 5. There are no grammatical mistakes that stick out to me. All scientific names are written correctly.

Overall, you did a great job with this project! -Sachi Patel

Reviewer: Emily Scott

• General Comments: The main message is clear with the article being about the growth and yield increase of perennial chickpeas. The article was well written and easy to follow. With the paragraphs being organized in a good manner, and everything made sense where it was. The title of the article is super descriptive, but I would maybe make it into a sub heading of the main article instead of its own stand alone article.

• Grammar: There were no grammar errors as far as I could see.

• References: The references were cited correctly and well, but the actual citation in the text was a little sparse and could perhaps benefit from more frequent citing.

AfD

Admittedly, a student paper. Well written but is a synthesis of sources.68.148.186.93 (talk) 10:05, 7 June 2016 (UTC)