Talk:Heartland Christian Academy, Missouri

This article was nominated for deletion on 27 September 2023. The result of the discussion was keep.

Missouri Low‑importance

	Missouri portal This article is part of WikiProject Missouri, a WikiProject related to the U.S. state of Missouri. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.MissouriWikipedia:WikiProject MissouriTemplate:WikiProject MissouriMissouri articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Christianity Low‑importance

	Christianity portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Christianity, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Christianity on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ChristianityWikipedia:WikiProject ChristianityTemplate:WikiProject ChristianityChristianity articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Schools Low‑importance

	Schools portal This article is related to WikiProject Schools, a collaborative effort to write quality articles about schools around the world. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page.SchoolsWikipedia:WikiProject SchoolsTemplate:WikiProject Schoolsschool articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Assertion of Notability

1 It includes an secondary school.
2 Major government actions were taken against it.
3 A court made a major decision against the government.

Thus appropriate to include as an article in Wikipedia. --Zfish118^⋉talk 06:36, 8 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Neutrality Issues

The article has been significantly expanded. While the additional sources are welcome, there are many issues of tone and organization.

The founding section doesn't read neutrally, albeit unneutrally in the school's favor. Terms like "welcomes" whole families editorialize.

The coverage of the abuse allegation details seems undo, as the allegations were not held up in court. The timeline of allegations and enforcement actions is unclear.

A paragraph is dedicated to the school's response to an incident where 11 students were removed, but no response to the 115 removed. For the manure incident, it is unclear what the students were forced to do. The commentary about the school's responses implies the school is more concerned about its image, which is editorializing. All criticism must be directly cited, not made or implied in Wikipedia's voice.

The further activism section implies the school "negotiated" in bad faith, by turning around and suing, which is more editorializing. The roll of the school in the purported negotiations is not clear, nor what the school hoped to achieve in its negotiations. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Zfish118 (talk • contribs)