Talk:Heart pine

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Woodworking, a project which is currently considered to be inactive.WoodworkingWikipedia:WikiProject WoodworkingTemplate:WikiProject WoodworkingWoodworking articles

Heart Pine refers to the heartwood of the pine tree, which is the non-living center of the tree trunk, while the sapwood is the outer living layer which transports nutrients. The heartwood from the pine tree, heart pine, is preferred by woodworkers and builders over the sapwood, due to its strength, hardness and golden red coloration. The longleaf pine, the source of much of the available heart pine found on the market is considered a high quality timber tree, a well known source for poles, pilings, posts, sawlogs, flooring, plywood, pulpwood and naval stores (tapped for turpentine).

Before the 1700's, in the United States, longleaf pine forests, covered approximately 30-60 million acres along the coastal plain from Virginia's southern tip to eastern Texas. These pine trees, 80 to 120 feet tall, require 100 to 150 years to become full size and can live up to 500 years. An inch of heart pine requires 30 years growth. Due to deforestation and over-harvesting since colonial days, only about 3% of the original Longleaf Pine forest remains.

Currently heart pine for building and woodworking is procured by by reclaiming old lumber and recovering logs, felled pre-1900's from rivers.

References

http://www.na.fs.fed.us/pubs/silvics_manual/Volume_1/pinus/palustris.htm Pinus palustris Mill

http://www.heartpine.com/about/history_heartpine.shtml History of Heart Pine

The artcle from heartpine.com with the original copyright infringement has been donated and an email from the author was submitted to the addresses given in the information about donating articles, thanks! Springmata (talk) 01:39, 12 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I added the heart pine page and thought I had edited it enough to not infringe on copyright, I would like to view the article I submitted so I can continue to rework it, but I can't find it any longer. Springmata (talk) 18:47, 6 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

You can see the old version in the page history here, but it would really be better if you rewrote it from scratch, instead of just trying to change the words around enough. Writ Keeper ⚇♔ 18:54, 6 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

New text

Hey, Springmata, the new text looks pretty good! Well done. I'll take it upon myself to copy it over into the main article. Trevj's suggestion at the Teahouse is a good one, though; in-line citations are preferable to just a reference list. Here's a guide to doing inline citations Wikipedia-style; feel free to ask me or the Teahouse at large if you need more help with it. Good luck! Writ Keeper ⚇♔ 19:19, 18 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]