Talk:Heart Attack (2014 film)
Appearance
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Reviews
[edit]We don't need (or want) two long paragraphs full of review quotes. Wikipedia is not Rotten Tomatoes. --NeilN talk to me 14:28, 11 February 2014 (UTC)
- @NeilN: It is customary to quote individual reviews to reflect independent opinions of the film. Is it a problem with the overall length or with the reliability of the sources? Seems like a middle ground is possible. Erik (talk | contrib) (ping me) 14:47, 11 February 2014 (UTC)
- TheRedPenOfDoom has an issue with reliability. For me, it's the length. Four or five sources should be adequate. My edit cut the second paragraph to accomplish this. --NeilN talk to me 14:54, 11 February 2014 (UTC)
- Anyone can have an opinion. Anyone and their brother can have a website and throw their opinion on there. Anyone with a studio that is releasing movies can hype their products on websites that don't have reliable editorial controls (or attempt to tear down their competitors). Thats why we are selective and only use professional critics from reliably published sources. Wikipedia:WikiProject_Films/Style_guidelines#Critical_response -- TRPoD aka The Red Pen of Doom 17:17, 11 February 2014 (UTC)
- TheRedPenOfDoom has an issue with reliability. For me, it's the length. Four or five sources should be adequate. My edit cut the second paragraph to accomplish this. --NeilN talk to me 14:54, 11 February 2014 (UTC)
Categories:
- Start-Class film articles
- Start-Class Indian cinema articles
- Indian cinema task force articles
- WikiProject Film articles
- Start-Class India articles
- Low-importance India articles
- Start-Class India articles of Low-importance
- Low-importance Indian cinema articles
- Start-Class Indian cinema articles of Low-importance
- WikiProject Indian cinema articles
- WikiProject India articles