Jump to content

Talk:Healthcare-NOW!

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This article was rewritten in order and follows the templates posted on Wikipedia. This falls under the category of WikiProject Organizations and should not be deleted —Preceding unsigned comment added by Blumuffph11 (talk • contribs) 19:28, 2 July 2008

Hundreds if not thousands of companies would fall under WikiProject Organizations, but most aren't major enough to get their own article. You should have consulted with "Requested Articles", and ask if this is notable enough. Yojimbo501 (talk) 19:35, 2 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
And at the very least you should have read WP:CORP and WP:SPAM. – ukexpat (talk) 19:36, 2 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

And you can get banned for reposting deleted material. Yojimbo501 (talk) 19:38, 2 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The second article reposted was a complete revision of the first. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Blumuffph11 (talk • contribs) 20:26, 2 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I found reasons to contest the reposting because of this revision. I was unfamilar to the process involving asking about notable organizations. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Blumuffph11 (talk • contribs) 20:32, 2 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Well, I'd suggest contacting a moderator or something. Yojimbo501 (talk) 20:37, 2 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I agree. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 129.176.151.10 (talk) 21:49, 5 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

This is not terribly relevant, but single payor is probably not a part of the cure. The Japanese healthcare system is a universal system. Their child mortality and longevity are a bit better than in the U.S. while their per capita cost is lower. BUT it isn't single payor. The concept of single payor rises from a misunderstanding and mistrust of the insurance business. While you may not trust an individual insuror, the business model is reasonably efficient. The Japanese system allows a small governmental unit to provide insurance as well as a trade union or an employer. I may not have it completely right, but there was a paper in Science over ten years ago that was written by an actuary. That was back when Hillary and Friends were pushing single payor.b_calder (talk) —Preceding undated comment added 02:28, 14 August 2009 (UTC).[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Healthcare-NOW!. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 21:24, 31 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Healthcare-NOW!&oldid=1254105617"