Talk:Health coaching/Archives/2012

NPOV tag

I do not agree with the addition of this tag. This article cites reliable sources. --Vince (talk) 13:11, 27 August 2008 (UTC)

WP:NPOV doesn't just relate to sources, it relates to how the article is written. I get the impression from reading the article that undue weight is being applied to the positive aspects of health coaching and that no negative aspects are discussed. I'm not sure if there are negative aspects or not, but this should be clarified. If there aren't any negative aspects discussed in the sources you provided, or in other sources elsewhere, then I'll happily remove the tag. —Cyclonenim (talk · contribs) 13:37, 27 August 2008 (UTC)

Actually, I think I've made a mistake here. I originally read the article and thought it came across with undue weight, but I've reread it and don't actually think it's all that bad. I'll remove the tag, sorry for the hassle. This is the downside to semi-automated editing with Huggle! —Cyclonenim (talk · contribs) 13:41, 27 August 2008 (UTC)

Article needs a section on health coaching research with relevant references

Stephenpalmer (talk) 10:15, 20 November 2012 (UTC)Some years ago the original entry on health coaching referenced the early academic articles on health coaching plus a variety of definitions. This current health coaching entry would benefit from more research being included. It also needs to take more of a worldview too. Worth discussing how we can improve it. I don't usually input on Wikipedia entries but this one does need revision. Stephenpalmer (talk) 10:15, 20 November 2012 (UTC)