Talk:Health Services Union

	Organized Labour portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Organized Labour, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles related to Organized Labour on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Organized LabourWikipedia:WikiProject Organized LabourTemplate:WikiProject Organized Labourorganized labour articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Australia Start‑class Low‑importance

	Australia portal Health Services Union is within the scope of WikiProject Australia, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Australia and Australia-related topics. If you would like to participate, visit the project page.AustraliaWikipedia:WikiProject AustraliaTemplate:WikiProject AustraliaAustralia articles
Start	This article has been given a rating which conflicts with the project-independent quality rating in the banner shell. Please resolve this conflict if possible.
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	Need help improving this article? Ask a Librarian^{What's this?} at the National Library of Australia.
	The Wikimedia Australia chapter can be contacted via email to helpwikimedia.org.au for non-editorial assistance.

Fair use rationale for Image:Hsulogo.jpg

Image:Hsulogo.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 07:02, 1 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Scandal

Given the amount of attention this otherwise minor union has received in the past three years, it seems to me that we really should look at providing a more complete timeline of the scandal, identifying the major players and so on. The internal affairs of the HSU appear to be rather complex and changeable over the years and people are going to be coming here for information about what's going on. I'm actually surprised that we haven't covered this previously. I think (as I indicated at Talk:Craig Thomson (politician) that we should have an appropriately titled article, and I'm open to suggestions. HSU scandal, perhaps? --Pete (talk) 22:15, 7 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Given any individual is innocent until proven guilty, publishing unsubstantiated allegations, such as those I've seen against Craig Thomson (politician), may render the author libel. It is unsurprising that a timeline of the allegations has not been published, as the relevant pages in Wikipedia seem to be heavily bias to support those making the 'unsubstantiated' allegations. There are currently allegations raised against Kathy Jackson (Kathy Koukouvaos), concerning her partner being a prominent individual with Fair Work Australia, yet none of this is evident from the Wikipedia entries. There's no mention of her outlandish salary, and unbelievable denials of known circumstances concerning other HSU officials. Wikipedia is being abused, the standard has dropped remarkably in a few years, with so many bias entries remaining online.Gymboot (talk) 16:55, 24 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Health Services Union. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added {{dead link}} tag to https://au.news.yahoo.com/a/25770688/ex-mp-craig-thomson-to-learn-his-fate/
Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20050625080457/http://www.actu.asn.au/ to http://www.actu.asn.au/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 19:35, 31 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]