This article is within the scope of WikiProject Computing, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of computers, computing, and information technology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ComputingWikipedia:WikiProject ComputingTemplate:WikiProject ComputingComputing articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Law, an attempt at providing a comprehensive, standardised, pan-jurisdictional and up-to-date resource for the legal field and the subjects encompassed by it.LawWikipedia:WikiProject LawTemplate:WikiProject Lawlaw articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Chiropractic, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Chiropractic on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ChiropracticWikipedia:WikiProject ChiropracticTemplate:WikiProject ChiropracticChiropractic articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject U.S. Congress, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the United States Congress on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.U.S. CongressWikipedia:WikiProject U.S. CongressTemplate:WikiProject U.S. CongressU.S. Congress articles
This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 2 September 2021 and 14 December 2021. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Kfsimerau. Peer reviewers: Devinyousif.
This edit by User:Scribbie adds an advertisement template to this article. I don't understand the justification for the edit, which is summarized in edit history as "Something gives me the vibe that this article is written like an advertisement." In order to improve the article, I'm asking for some guidance about what specifically needs to be improved rather than just a "vibe." A number of editors (such as, recently, User:Kuru) have put effort into eliminating advertisement-based sources. However, reading the article now, most statements are factual and supported by legitimate sources (and, granted plenty of cn tags). So I'm at a loss as to why the advertisement template would apply here, or what would need to be changed to justify removing it. Clarification would be appreciated, and absent any clarification I will WP:BEBOLD and remove it. DoubleRelevance (talk) 03:11, 16 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Agreed. Remove it. I'm not sure why it was placed. That editor never met here to discuss perceived issues, nor did they explain their reasoning in their edit summary when they placed the template. Article seems just fine. Cleter (talk) 16:23, 19 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]