Talk:Headley, Surrey

Removed some school information irrelevant to this article:

As of 1st September 2006 The Leatherhead Trinity School and Children's Centre will come into being as the result of a merge between Woodville School, St Mary's School and All Saints School. A new uniform has also been unveiled which will be predominantly red. As well as being a bold colour it was chosen because it is different from the uniforms of the three old schools. Southeastern 00:59, 19 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

unsourced

There seems to be an unsourced tag on this page. I've put in references, but can't find the unsourced tag to remove it. If you know what's going on please do remove it, you can see it flagged up in the categories at the bottom of the page but I can't find it in the code. SuzanneKn 16:40, 13 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Nimbyism Fallacy

I have removed this section of the article because this incident occured in Leatherhead and not Headley and has been reported in the local newspaper. --HappyWanderer (talk) 11:50, 21 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Accusations of Nimbyism

In 2007 some local residents objected to the siting of a 'home from home' for the families of wounded service personnel being treated at Headley Court, leading to accusations of nimbyism appearing in the national media. Objections cited included 'children playing in the street' and 'increased traffic'.

The families of injured service personnel were understandably upset, "I can't believe their attitude - it beggars belief," said Sue Norton, wife of Capt Peter Norton, an Army bomb disposal officer who was awarded the George Cross for bravery after losing a leg and part of an arm in Iraq. —Preceding unsigned comment added by HappyWanderer (talk • contribs) 11:50, 21 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Headley, Surrey. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070715015325/http://www.gwp.enta.net/surrnames.htm to http://www.gwp.enta.net/surrnames.htm

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 18:21, 31 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Articles in the Proceedings of the Leatherhead & District Local History Society

Here are a few articles on Headley from the Proceedings of the Leatherhead & District Local History Society, which may be of interest to anyone wanting to expand this page:

Harding, Joan M (1969). "Slough Farm, Headley" (PDF). Proceedings of the Leatherhead & District Local History Society. 3 (3): 83–86. Retrieved 8 February 2021.
Blair, WJ (1974). "A survey of churchyard memorials: Fetcham and Headley" (PDF). Proceedings of the Leatherhead & District Local History Society. 3 (8): 248–253. Retrieved 8 February 2021.
Blair, WJ (1978). "The destroyed medieval church at Headley" (PDF). Proceedings of the Leatherhead & District Local History Society. 4 (2): 39–45. Retrieved 8 February 2021.
Smith, LA (1989). "Headley Grove estate" (PDF). Proceedings of the Leatherhead & District Local History Society. 5 (3): 86–96. Retrieved 8 February 2021.

Best wishes, Mertbiol (talk) 22:06, 8 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]