Talk:Heading Out

Television: British / Episode coverage Low‑importance

	Television portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Television, a collaborative effort to develop and improve Wikipedia articles about television programs. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page where you can join the discussion. To improve this article, please refer to the style guidelines for the type of work.TelevisionWikipedia:WikiProject TelevisionTemplate:WikiProject Televisiontelevision articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the British television task force (assessed as Low-importance).
	This article is supported by the Episode coverage task force.
	An editor has requested that an image or photograph be added to this article.

BBC: Sitcoms Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject BBC, an attempt to better organise information in articles related to the BBC. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page where you can join us as a member. You can also visit the BBC Portal.BBCWikipedia:WikiProject BBCTemplate:WikiProject BBCBBC articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

This article is supported by BBC Sitcoms Task Force.

Tasks for WikiProject BBC:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

Article requests : Improve BBC, BBC News (TV channel) and BBC News to Good Article status following previous reviews, create BBC Computer Literacy Project (in light of forthcoming 30th anniversary)
Cleanup : Chucklevision - references and general clean-up, Pebble Mill Studios - over-detailed and long, BBC World Service Television - unreferenced and confusing
Copyedit : BBC News, Broadcasting House
Expand : Top 20 start-class BBC articles with most importance: BBC Japan, BBC World Service Television, BBC Lifestyle, BBC Two Northern Ireland
NPOV : Criticism of the BBC (See comments)
Stubs : Stub-Class BBC articles
Other : *Restructure the category
- Add infoboxes to the BBC articles without infoboxes
- Add free-use images to biographical articles where possible
- Add references to Goa Mix (see assessment) and Coat of arms of the BBC
- Return Dad's Army to a Good article. (See comments)
- Reassess BBC following improvements to article.

Comedy Low‑importance

	Comedy portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Comedy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of comedy on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ComedyWikipedia:WikiProject ComedyTemplate:WikiProject ComedyComedy articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

LGBTQ+ studies

This article is of interest to WikiProject LGBTQ+ studies, which tries to ensure comprehensive and factual coverage of all LGBTQ-related issues on Wikipedia. For more information, or to get involved, please visit the project page or contribute to the discussion.LGBTQ+ studiesWikipedia:WikiProject LGBTQ+ studiesTemplate:WikiProject LGBTQ+ studiesLGBTQ+ studies articles

Review

[1] Worthy of inclusion –anemone projectors– 11:40, 27 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Added. But feel free to change it or move things around. - JuneGloom Talk 16:37, 27 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

That's ok. I have some print reviews, so will add those. Heat magazine, The Sun. Also Daran Little tweeted his opinion, and as he's a notable person and a writer I guess we can include that, though his account isn't verified... I'm not sure. –anemone projectors– 10:48, 6 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

[2][3] Mirror reviews there. –anemone projectors– 17:21, 10 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Ratings

The second episode didn't make the top 30 for BBC Two, so had fewer than 1.24million viewers. Do we just leave the overnight rating in? –anemone projectors– 08:35, 20 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I think so. It would be better to have something, than nothing at all there. - JuneGloom Talk 15:00, 20 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I agree, as long as it's clear that it's overnights (which it is). Shame the ratings dropped so much though, I've been enjoying it. Though last night was the first time I've watched it live. –anemone projectors– 21:15, 20 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]