Talk:He Stopped Loving Her Today

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Songs, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of songs on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SongsWikipedia:WikiProject SongsTemplate:WikiProject Songssong articles

United States: Music Low‑importance

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	Music portal This article is supported by WikiProject American music.

Library of Congress Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Library of Congress, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the Library of Congress on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Library of CongressWikipedia:WikiProject Library of CongressTemplate:WikiProject Library of CongressLibrary of Congress articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the importance scale.

Country music

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Country music, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles related to country music on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Country musicWikipedia:WikiProject Country musicTemplate:WikiProject Country musicCountry music articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Spammer blog

If you say that the same link went to a bunch of other articles, I'll take your word for it that it's more or less spam. I think this link could legitimately go the song in question, plus to George Jones, and that's about it. If there's an article called Greatest Country Song of All Time, then it could go there as well, hehe. So, I'll let it stay deleted. Hayford Peirce 03:40, 2 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Apology

Dear Friends,

I am not a spammer. I am a real live country music lover and professor of history at McLennan Community College. I respectfully request that you consider this post from my blog as an addition to this link (and any other appropriate link): http://bosqueboys.com/index.php?itemid=34

Ashley Cruseturner

My email address: acruseturner@mclennan.edu

PS I apologize for violating the protocol in adding this link without prior consultation. Ignorance of the law is no excuse; therefore I ask for grace rather than justice.

I don't think you have anything to apologize about -- not everyone (including me) knows all the recondite protocols of Wiki. And even those who do, argue vehemently about them. I myself still think that as a stand-alone link yours is perfectly legitimate and should be there. Ditto chez George Jones. And, given what you have said above, it's likely that the other article links are legit also. I know that in my own case, I once wrote a paragraph about Jack Kramer (tennis player)'s choice of the 21 best tennis players of all time (as of 1979) and eventually put the same paragraph (and footnote) into at least 25 or 30 different articles. So, just because a link can show up in more than 2 or 3 articles, doesn't mean that it isn't legitimate. Keep defending your point of view.... Hayford Peirce 04:06, 2 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your support. So, in re "defending my point of view," what is my next step? My case in a nutshell is this: Wikipedia prides itself on a "meritocratic" approach. I ask that my contribution be judged on content rather than origin. Thanks again, Hayford Peirce, for your comments in support of my petition. Ashley

One point of clarification: I did not add the same link to more than one article. I added individual links to several articles. For example, I added this link (Clooneyism: History Hollywood-style) to the George Clooney movie, Good Night and Good Luck, which I think offers several points that add to the discussion of the film in context of current poltics and the McCarthy era. Ashley
- Please see the comment I just wrote at User talk:Joyous!. And feel free to write your own comment at the same place. Then wait a while and we'll see what happens. Hayford Peirce 16:41, 2 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

If you'd like to re-add the link, I won't protest. Joyous! | Talk 03:34, 3 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Danke -- I'll stick it back in Hayford Peirce 04:03, 3 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  - Thanks so much [[Acruset 14:57, 4 November 2006 (UTC)]][reply]

Confusing

"Jones stated in a 2002 Country Music Television interview that he told the producer he "...would record the song," but did not think it would sell "because it [was] too sad." Jones also bet the record producer that it would do poorly. Jones gladly lost his bet, for it would be the biggest hit of his career and for nearly three decades would be his trademark song."

This section reads oddly - it looks like he announced the song in 2002, but it then defined him for 30 years, which seems unlikely. Not sure exactly what point is supposed to come across. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.119.29.177 (talk) 07:21, 17 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on He Stopped Loving Her Today. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 17:17, 31 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]