Talk:He's Just Not That Into You

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Books. To participate in the project, please visit its page, where you can join the project and discuss matters related to book articles. To use this banner, please refer to the documentation. To improve this article, please refer to the relevant guideline for the type of work.BooksWikipedia:WikiProject BooksTemplate:WikiProject BooksBook articles

Romance Mid‑importance

	Literature portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Romance, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to fictional romance in literature and romantic fiction writers. If you would like to participate, you can edit one of the articles mentioned below, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and contribute to the general Project discussion to talk over new ideas and suggestions.RomanceWikipedia:WikiProject RomanceTemplate:WikiProject Romanceromance articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Critque

Re: Criticism

  "It is also noted that the phrase "he's just not that into you" may have originated
  from an episode of Sex and the City in its final season."

Greg was a consultant on 2 episodes of Sex and the City & in interviews said he got the idea for the book after saying "he's just not that into you" to one of the writers during a meeting.

Spam

What the hell is a 'visual mathematician'? Ppe42 22:52, 26 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

NPOV problems

This article needs some serious clean-up.

First of all, it doesn't appear that the author of this article has even read the book because a lot of their information is not altogether correct. Also, the section "Criticism" seems to be the author's main focus and lacks neutrality.

This article needs to be cleaned up by someone who can better summarize the book. I also think that the "Criticism" section should be eliminated or rewritten by a more neutral party.

Thank you —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 24.19.194.229 (talk) 02:31, 30 December 2006 (UTC).[reply]

Neutrality

It's not the page that's slanted, but the book. You can't write a non-slanted page on a slanted book. - hmwith talk 08:08, 19 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Amen! that book is very anti-woman! —Preceding unsigned comment added by 15.251.169.69 (talk) 00:06, 21 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Could someone add at least some criticism or even an evaluation of the book based on some mainstream intellectual theories or responses to it? I was hoping for a balanced appraisel when I came to this page not just a paragraph that describes the contents in a way that glosses over any critical reception. At this rate I'll have to by a copy of the thing. Empty Hat. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Empty Hat (talk • contribs) 02:03, 12 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:1416909532.01. SCLZZZZZZZ SS500 .jpg

Image:1416909532.01. SCLZZZZZZZ SS500 .jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If there is other other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.Betacommand ^{(talk • contribs • Bot)} 00:33, 25 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:1416909532.01. SCLZZZZZZZ SS500 .jpg

Image:1416909532.01. SCLZZZZZZZ SS500 .jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot 06:23, 27 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]