Talk:Hazara Express/Archive 1

This is an archive of past discussions about Hazara Express. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page.

Archive 1

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Hazara Express. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080414060608/http://www.dailytimes.com.pk/default.asp?page=2006 to http://www.dailytimes.com.pk/default.asp?page=2006

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 17:13, 16 July 2016 (UTC)

Past tense already?

Will the line be closed permanently as a consequence of the accident? --Rinaku (t · c) 12:57, 7 August 2023 (UTC)

Someone will have jumped the gun and wrongly concluded that the train has crashed and therefore cannot run again. That’s wrong because there wasn’t just a single train providing this service; there were several. Probably three. It’s easy to work out how many by looking at the train's schedule. The article tells us that the train runs daily (i.e. departs every 24 hrs) and takes 33 hours to get from A to B. One could look up the scheduled arrival time at B and the start of the next journey leaving B for A. My guess is that there is 3 hours between arrival and departure because that adds up to 36 hours, or 72 hours for the round trip. And a 72-hour round trip for a daily service means that you need three trains to achieve that.

I therefore suggest that changing the article to past tense be reverted. Either way, changes like that should always be supported by reliable sources. Schwede 66 16:43, 7 August 2023 (UTC)