Talk:Hayborough

Australia: Places / South Australia Low‑importance

	Australia portal Hayborough is within the scope of WikiProject Australia, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Australia and Australia-related topics. If you would like to participate, visit the project page.AustraliaWikipedia:WikiProject AustraliaTemplate:WikiProject AustraliaAustralia articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Australian places (assessed as Low-importance).
	This article is supported by WikiProject South Australia (assessed as Low-importance).
	Need help improving this article? Ask a Librarian^{What's this?} at the National Library of Australia, or the State Library of South Australia.
	The Wikimedia Australia chapter can be contacted via email to helpwikimedia.org.au for non-editorial assistance.

Requested move 22 March 2015

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: Moved. Just one oppose, and a consensus of supports, with valid reasoning. (non-admin closure) — Amakuru (talk) 10:07, 30 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hayborough, South Australia → Hayborough – Unique name not requiring disambiguation. Wikipedia:Naming conventions (geographic names)#Australia does not require disambiguation and many places in Australia are at their undisambiguated names - e.g. Category:Towns in South Australia. The article has been undisambigated to its unique name here and recently re-disambiguated here. Mattinbgn (talk) 19:42, 22 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose as the user who moved the article back to its original place (Hayborough, South Australia). It is clear that the majority of articles in the category still comply with the first clause of the naming convention "Most Australian settlement articles are at Town, State/Territory;" Most of the others I've looked at recently were moved from that form in March-April last year by a Phillipino wikipedian who appears to be holding the same discussion at present with respect to naming of Phillipino barangays. It's somewhat arbitrary whether to regard the comma Statename convention as disambiguation or as fully qualified names. I doubt you'd post a letter from very far away to someone at Hayborough without either a state name or a postcode-beginning-with-5 and expect it to arrive promptly. I've recently resumed my patrol of SA places articles, ensuring that both Placename and Placename, South Australia can lead a reader or editor to the article they are looking for either directly (including redirects) or through hatnotes and disambig pages. I've left most of the ones I found had been moved last year, not sure why I decided to move this one in particular. --Scott Davis ^Talk 05:20, 23 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Support per nom and per the discussion linked to above. This is unnecessary disambiguation, not required by any policy or guideline. Dohn joe (talk) 14:18, 23 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support per nom. CookieMonster755 (talk) 00:49, 24 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support - The suggested name is precise and requires no disambiguation. Mbcap (talk) 01:26, 29 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Hayborough. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20160122135728/http://premierstateliner.com.au/media/uploads/timetables/goolwa-010615.pdf to http://premierstateliner.com.au/media/uploads/timetables/goolwa-010615.pdf

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 13:19, 31 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]