Talk:Hawks (band)

	This article was reviewed by member(s) of WikiProject Articles for creation. The project works to allow users to contribute quality articles and media files to the encyclopedia and track their progress as they are developed. To participate, please visit the project page for more information.Articles for creationWikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creationTemplate:WikiProject Articles for creationAfC articles
	This article was accepted on 7 October 2013 by reviewer Aggie80 (talk · contribs).

Rock music

	Rock music portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Rock music, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Rock music on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Rock musicWikipedia:WikiProject Rock musicTemplate:WikiProject Rock musicRock music articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Links to other articles??

I am not understanding the suggestion to find links to other articles for this article. There are many links out of the page to other Wikipedia articles such as "power pop" and "Columbia Records". Since the header has the suggestion for links to this article from others I am assuming it is not talking about these kind of links. My original thought was doing something like adding Hawks to the article on power pop, but I do not believe this is appropriate nor the correct approach. What would be a good way to go about adding the links mentioned in the header? Thanks!THX1136 (talk) 15:10, 10 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Article Layout Question

There is a notice that the layout needs attention. If someone could provide guidance in this area I would appreciate it. I feel that the layout resembles that of similar articles so am at a loss as to how to improve it. Thanks!THX1136 (talk) 16:11, 7 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Hawks (band). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20131019171230/http://www.glorydazemusic.com/articles.php?article_id=2784 to http://www.glorydazemusic.com/articles.php?article_id=2784

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 21:02, 30 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Not the same as Hawk

Apparently no Wikipedia article either. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=beyU5j-k4o4 CoatCheck (talk) 16:15, 22 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

As you may have concluded the band you linked to is not this band. If you believe that 'Hawk' is notable for some reason, I would encourage you to write an article yourself. That's what I did for this one. It may or may not be worth the effort.THX1136 (talk) 00:56, 18 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]