Talk:Haverhill–Bath Covered Bridge
Appearance
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Name
[edit]It seems that the name of this bridge should be rendered as Haverhill–Bath Covered Bridge, using an endash rather than a hyphen. See, for example, Cornish–Windsor Covered Bridge, or Chicagon Mine Road–Chicagon Creek Bridge, or Berkley–Dighton Bridge. Comments? Thanks. Dmoore5556 (talk) 23:18, 30 June 2020 (UTC)
- Yes, you're right, per MOS:DASH. --Ken Gallager (talk) 13:01, 1 July 2020 (UTC)
- Thanks for making the update. Dmoore5556 (talk) 18:31, 1 July 2020 (UTC)
Categories:
- Start-Class Bridge and Tunnel articles
- Low-importance Bridge and Tunnel articles
- WikiProject Bridges and Tunnels articles
- Start-Class National Register of Historic Places articles
- Low-importance National Register of Historic Places articles
- Start-Class National Register of Historic Places articles of Low-importance
- Start-Class United States articles
- Low-importance United States articles
- Start-Class United States articles of Low-importance
- Start-Class New Hampshire articles
- Low-importance New Hampshire articles
- WikiProject New Hampshire articles
- WikiProject United States articles