Jump to content

Talk:Haunted (Laura Les song)/GA1

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

GA Review

[edit]
GA toolbox
Reviewing

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Nominator: Skyshifter (talk · contribs) 16:32, 15 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reviewer: Heartfox (talk · contribs) 03:49, 11 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Rate Attribute Review Comment
1. Well-written:
1a. the prose is clear, concise, and understandable to an appropriately broad audience; spelling and grammar are correct.
  • "On the inspiration for "Haunted", Laura Les said:" → maybe just "Laura Les described the song as 'mostly...'"
    • Done
  • "first played at the A2B2 Night of Fire festival" → where is that?
    • Added (it was virtual)
1b. it complies with the Manual of Style guidelines for lead sections, layout, words to watch, fiction, and list incorporation.
2. Verifiable with no original research, as shown by a source spot-check:
2a. it contains a list of all references (sources of information), presented in accordance with the layout style guideline.
2b. reliable sources are cited inline. All content that could reasonably be challenged, except for plot summaries and that which summarizes cited content elsewhere in the article, must be cited no later than the end of the paragraph (or line if the content is not in prose).
  • Dog Show Records, Les writing/production credits, and track length needs refs in the body
    • Done
  • I'm a little confused on the release date. Exclaim article was published on March 11 – was it not released then?
    • Probably something related to time zones? All streaming services say it was released on the 12th.
2c. it contains no original research.
2d. it contains no copyright violations or plagiarism.
3. Broad in its coverage:
3a. it addresses the main aspects of the topic.
3b. it stays focused on the topic without going into unnecessary detail (see summary style).
4. Neutral: it represents viewpoints fairly and without editorial bias, giving due weight to each.
5. Stable: it does not change significantly from day to day because of an ongoing edit war or content dispute.
6. Illustrated, if possible, by media such as images, video, or audio:
6a. media are tagged with their copyright statuses, and valid non-free use rationales are provided for non-free content.
6b. media are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions.
7. Overall assessment.

Nice article. Best, Heartfox (talk) 04:09, 11 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Heartfox: done! Skyshiftertalk 18:24, 11 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@Skyshifter: Promoted. If you have time, my current GAN for Outside (Mariah Carey song) is in need of a review. Thanks, Heartfox (talk) 13:29, 12 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]