Talk:Hathras district

India: Districts / Uttar Pradesh / Geography Mid‑importance

	India portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject India, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of India-related topics. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page.IndiaWikipedia:WikiProject IndiaTemplate:WikiProject IndiaIndia articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Indian districts (assessed as Mid-importance).
	This article is supported by WikiProject Uttar Pradesh (assessed as Low-importance).
	This article is supported by the Indian geography workgroup (assessed as Low-importance).

It is requested that an image or photograph of Hathras district be included in this article to improve its quality. Please replace this template with a more specific media request template where possible.

Wikipedians in Uttar Pradesh may be able to help!

The Free Image Search Tool or Openverse Creative Commons Search may be able to locate suitable images on Flickr and other web sites.

Upload

Requested move

The following discussion is an archived discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: uncontested move. DrKiernan (talk) 14:50, 3 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Mahamaya Nagar district → Hathras district – The district has been renamed by the government (yet again). See the official notification. Also, per WP:COMMONNAME, this should be at that name in the first place. See google search results: Hathras -wikipedia (5,390,000 for me) and Mahamayanagar -wikipedia(711,000 for me). Siddhartha Ghai (talk) 22:14, 25 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Survey

Feel free to state your position on the renaming proposal by beginning a new line in this section with *'''Support''' or *'''Oppose''', then sign your comment with ~~~~. Since polling is not a substitute for discussion, please explain your reasons, taking into account Wikipedia's policy on article titles.

Support as per nom. In ictu oculi (talk) 00:56, 26 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Hathras district. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20151117215932/http://lgdirectory.gov.in/globalviewvillage.do?OWASP_CSRFTOKEN=FXC1-8XZE-FADJ-GBS4-Q9GV-PRMF-HY2Z-TN1N to http://lgdirectory.gov.in/globalviewvillage.do?OWASP_CSRFTOKEN=FXC1-8XZE-FADJ-GBS4-Q9GV-PRMF-HY2Z-TN1N

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 06:12, 31 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]