Talk:Harvela Investments Ltd v Royal Trust of Canada (CI) Ltd
 | This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
| |||||||||||
The reporting of this case in the synopsed 'facts' is missleading. The House Of Lords ruled in favour of Harvela - stating that a referential bid did not satisfy the demands of the seller in that they require a 'specific' amount.
— Preceding unsigned comment added by 138.37.7.247 (talk) 15:17, 2 October 2011 (UTC)