Talk:Hartford City Courthouse Square Historic District/GA1
Appearance
GA Review
[edit]GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
Reviewer: DustFormsWords (talk) 04:48, 11 January 2011 (UTC)
This appears to be a thoroughly well-developed article and my initial impression is that it is well overdue for Good Article status.
- It is reasonably well written.
- a (prose): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
- (a) The article is reasonably well written, and makes appropriate use of structure, hatnotes and wikilinks to provide context.
- (b) The article complies with the MOS for lead sections. (Comment: The current lead section passes the GA criteria but could be improved by (1) explaining what the District is (an area of land? a collection of buildings?) and (2) explaining the scale of the area, possibly by incorporating the acreage information from the infobox.)
- (b) The article complies with the MOS for layout. (Comment: Personally I prefer to see References appear above Notes but the MOS informs me there is no consensus for this preference.)
- (b) The article complies with the MOS for word choice.
- (b) The MOS for fiction is not applicable to this article.
- (b) The article complies with the MOS for embedded lists.
- a (prose): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
- It is factually accurate and verifiable.
- a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
- (a) The article complies with our policies on formatting references and uses citation templates when appropriate.
- (b) The article provides inline citations against all outstanding statements, statements likely to be challenged, and direct quotes, and as far as I am able to determine the cited sources support the article content.
- (c) There is no evidence of original research in the article.
- a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
- It is broad in its coverage.
- It follows the neutral point of view policy.
- It is stable.
- It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
- a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
- (a & b) All images used in the article now have appropriate licensing information and descriptive text.
- (a & b) I'd personally like to see alt text for all images (currently none have alt text) but upon further reading it appears this is specifically not a requirement for Good Article status. (Not required for GA status.)
- a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
- Overall: This is a thorough, well referenced and well illustrated article, and I am passing it as a Good Article. Issues to concentrate on for future improvement may include a lead section that more extensively covers the basic geometry of the area (its size, boundaries, etc), and the provision of alt text for the article's many images. - DustFormsWords (talk) 00:00, 12 January 2011 (UTC)
- Pass/Fail:
- Pass/Fail: