Talk:Harry S. Truman 1948 presidential campaign

Harry S. Truman 1948 presidential campaign is a featured article; it (or a previous version of it) has been identified as one of the best articles produced by the Wikipedia community. Even so, if you can update or improve it, please do so.

This article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page as Today's featured article on July 4, 2022.

Article milestones
Date	Process	Result
October 11, 2021	Good article nominee	Listed
October 18, 2021	Peer review	Reviewed
December 9, 2021	Featured article candidate	Promoted
A fact from this article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the "Did you know?" column on July 15, 2021. The text of the entry was: Did you know ... that despite most of the polls and 50 major political writers predicting victory for Thomas E. Dewey, Harry S. Truman won* the 1948 presidential election* (candidates pictured)?
Current status: Featured article

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Harry S. Truman 1948 presidential campaign article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Guild of Copy Editors

This article was copy edited by Twofingered Typist, a member of the Guild of Copy Editors, on July 22, 2021.Guild of Copy EditorsWikipedia:WikiProject Guild of Copy EditorsTemplate:WikiProject Guild of Copy EditorsGuild of Copy Editors articles

Elections and Referendums

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Elections and Referendums, an ongoing effort to improve the quality of, expand upon and create new articles relating to elections, electoral reform and other aspects of democratic decision-making. For more information, visit our project page.Elections and ReferendumsWikipedia:WikiProject Elections and ReferendumsTemplate:WikiProject Elections and ReferendumsElections and Referendums articles

History Low‑importance

	History portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject History, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the subject of History on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.HistoryWikipedia:WikiProject HistoryTemplate:WikiProject Historyhistory articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Politics: American Low‑importance

	Politics portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Politics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of politics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PoliticsWikipedia:WikiProject PoliticsTemplate:WikiProject Politicspolitics articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by American politics task force (assessed as Low-importance).

United States: Presidential elections Low‑importance

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject U.S. presidential elections (assessed as Mid-importance).

Military history: North America / United States

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles

Associated task forces:
/
	North American military history task force
	United States military history task force

DYK nomination transclusion

The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Z1720 (talk) 00:48, 13 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

(

Comment or view
Article history

)

Political cartoon by Jim Berryman depicting Truman and opponent Thomas E. Dewey campaigning in whistle stop train tours.

... that during his 1948 presidential campaign, Harry S. Truman conducted various whistle-stop tours (pictured) across the nation, travelling 35,290 miles (56,790 km) and delivering over 250 speeches? Source: Various sources in the article, see Ref 97, 98 and 99 in this version of article.
- ALT1:... that despite most of the polls and 50 major political writers of the nation predicting victory for Dewey, Harry S. Truman won the 1948 presidential election? Source: Various sources in the article, see Ref 104 and 105 in this version of article.

Reviewed: Sam Brownback 2008 presidential campaign
Comment: Date request - 14/15 July (Final day of 1948 DNC, Truman officially won the nomination) See here. Another image (File:Truman-Dewey-polls-1948.jpg) can be considered if Alt 1 in chosen.

Created by Kavyansh.Singh (talk). Self-nominated at 08:37, 4 July 2021 (UTC).[reply]

Date, length and hooks all OK (my preference is for ALT1), QPQ done, no close paraphrasing. Picture licence fine. Good to go. The C of E God Save the Queen! (talk) 06:28, 5 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Source comments

Some comments on the sourcing:

Reference 126 doesn't point to a source in Works Cited. Does it have the correct year?
"Bray, William J" does not have a reference that points to it.

@Kavyansh.Singh: maybe you can fix this. Z1720 (talk) 13:11, 13 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Z1720: Done - Corrected the year and added Bray References. Kavyansh.Singh (talk) 13:37, 13 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

GA Review

This review is transcluded from Talk:Harry S. Truman 1948 presidential campaign/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Reviewer: Maile66 (talk · contribs) 00:21, 11 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Kavyansh.Singh: I'm going to be doing this review for you, and, if needed, make comments here. I just made a handful of punctuation corrections based on MOS:HOWEVER. Anything else, I'll leave comments here for you. — Maile (talk) 00:21, 11 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Maile66 – Thanks a lot! I really spent some time in creating this article, and also want to nominate it for Featured article. Would appreciate any comments ... – Kavyansh.Singh (talk) 08:35, 11 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Background section

"nominated him as the vice-presidential nominee" seems redundant. How about something like, "chose him as the vice-presidential nominee", or "nominated him the vice-presidential running mate for Franklin Roosevent's fourth run for the presidency" or something similar.

Done. – Kavyansh.Singh (talk) 09:20, 11 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

"Truman implemented the Marshall Plan" Could you have something like "the Marshall Plan, allocating foreign aid for Western Europe."

Done. – Kavyansh.Singh (talk) 08:56, 11 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Those are the only two suggestions I have for that section. — Maile (talk) 00:40, 11 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Preparing for a run

"he considered choosing General Dwight D. Eisenhower as his running mate, but Eisenhower declined." Did Truman discuss it with Eisenhower, or did Eisenhower just make a public statement without being asked?

Well, I have corrected/expanded a few details from this section. Truman initially didn't wanted to run, and expected Eisenhower to lead the Democratic party as their nominee. He even had though of running as Eisenhower's VP! But Eisenhower declined to be a "politician" in a public statement. I have added few lines from Draft Eisenhower movement, an article I recently expanded. Imagine a president agreeing to be VP! Gerald Ford too somewhat agreed to be Reagan's VP in 1980, but that negotiation failed. – Kavyansh.Singh (talk) 10:15, 11 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Well, I learned something new today. I did not know Ford agreed to be Reagan's running mate. But I can see that, as Ford was a loyal team player.

"faced opposition within the Democratic Party by the Progressive movement led by" Perhaps say, "from the Progressive movement"

Done. – Kavyansh.Singh (talk) 08:56, 11 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Early developments

"Organizes failed to publicize" Maybe you meant either "organizations" or "organizers"

Yeah, its organizers. – Kavyansh.Singh (talk) 08:56, 11 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Democratic convention: No issues in this section

Campaign

Very well done, well detailed. No issues to correct.

Thanks! – Kavyansh.Singh (talk) 08:56, 11 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Election day: Everything looks good here.

Aftermath and legacy: Good wrap-up here, this is fine.

I've gone through the basics, and will check the rest of the Wikipedia:GACR tomorrow. — Maile (talk) 01:45, 11 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

1) Well written

Pass

2) Verifiable with no original research

Pass

This is extensively sourced, with no issues on either OR or copy vio dectors.

3) Broad in its coverage

Pass

4) Neutral

Pass

5) Stable

Pass

6) Illustrated

a. Copyright status and/or fair use if non-free ?
Pass

b. Captioned and relevant to topic ?
Pass

7) Overall

Pass

Congratulations. Job well done. — Maile (talk) 16:57, 11 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Maile66 – Thanks a lot! In your opinion, does this has any chances at FAC? I'll try to open a Peer review soon. – Kavyansh.Singh (talk) 17:05, 11 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Kavyansh.Singh: I believe this would be an excellent FAC. Go for it! — Maile (talk) 17:08, 11 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Also, @Kavyansh.Singh:, if you are planning Peer Review just to pick out any loose ends, Peer Review is pretty backed up. My recommendation, is to go straight to FAC. If there's anything you or I missed, FAC will catch it. — Maile (talk) 17:36, 11 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Maile66 – I can't go straight at FAC, as I already have one article (Daisy) at FAC, and to nominate another, the source review needs to be passed. I have opened the peer review page, and will request few reviewers, who might be interested in commenting. If nothing happens in a week or so, I'll directly go to FAC. How is that? – Kavyansh.Singh (talk) 17:44, 11 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Kavyansh.Singh: Ah ... I see it now, the Daisy campaign ad. OK. — Maile (talk) 18:37, 11 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.