Talk:Harry Readford

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles

Australia: Crime C‑class Low‑importance

	Australia portal Harry Readford is within the scope of WikiProject Australia, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Australia and Australia-related topics. If you would like to participate, visit the project page.AustraliaWikipedia:WikiProject AustraliaTemplate:WikiProject AustraliaAustralia articles
C	This article has been given a rating which conflicts with the project-independent quality rating in the banner shell. Please resolve this conflict if possible.
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Australian crime (assessed as Low-importance).
	Need help improving this article? Ask a Librarian^{What's this?} at the National Library of Australia.
	The Wikimedia Australia chapter can be contacted via email to helpwikimedia.org.au for non-editorial assistance.

Untitled

I want to contest vigorously the CSD on this article.

Harry Redford is acknowledged as a well-known figure in the early history of Australian pastoral expansion. A Google search brings up about 1500 references to him, some written by respected historians. He is included in the Australian Dictionary of Biography, Volume 4, published by Melbourne University Press. Any Australian historian would be aware of Harry Redford, who in his time became a sort of folk hero!! What more do I have to say?? Did anyone actually look at this article before applying the CSD??

This is only my second article, so I'm still a beginner at this game.

I should mention that I'm well aware that there's still some work to do on this article, especially internal references, further reading, etc. I hope to do that in the next few days.

 --ARBrennan 10:53, 19 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Bio is not online (http://www.adb.online.anu.edu.au/biogs/A030172b.htm?). It should be used as a reference either way.--Grahamec 03:41, 20 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Apology

I was incorrect in claiming that Harry Redford had an entry in the Aust Dictionary of Biography. My apologies. --ARBrennan 07:40, 23 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Redford's date of death

We seem to have two different dates, 1901 and 1911. Which is correct? I took the 1911 date from "The Drovers" by Keith Willey (Macmillan 1982), but I note that John Deckert in his web article says 1901. --ARBrennan 08:04, 23 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

captain starlight

I'm a little confused. Captain Starlight redirects here, and the text tells me that Harry Redford was the captain. However, I've also heard that Frank Pearson was captain Starlight,. Am I right in deducing that there were two bushrangers who used the name, a decade or two apart? The entry for Robbery Under Arms says the character by that name in that book is an amalgam of them both, plus another, which doesn't help me any.

If there are more than one Captains, I'll rewrite the page to be a brief disambiguation / clarification page.WotherspoonSmith (talk) 07:12, 16 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

It seems that THIS article should be for Harry Readford rather than redirecting to Captain Starlight. LowKey (talk) 10:35, 31 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The Man who was Starlight

A lot of this is straight from the text of Patrick McCarthy's book, The Man who was Starlight, Allen & Unwin, Sydney, 2009. Peter Bell (talk) 01:57, 29 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Captain Starlight. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

Y An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 21:20, 14 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Captain Starlight. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070929114054/http://www.westprint.com.au/Articles%20%26%20Stories/Captian%20Starlight.htm to http://www.westprint.com.au/Articles%20%26%20Stories/Captian%20Starlight.htm

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 15:17, 30 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

NOT a bushranger

Readford was a cattle duffer, not a bushranger. Even the description in the linked bushranger article defines them as armed robbers. Readford was a thief rather than a robber. He was also an accomplished drover. p.s. Oh look, we need an article on cattle duffers. LowKey (talk) 10:18, 31 October 2017 (UTC) .[reply]