Talk:Harry Potter and the Goblet of Fire/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Prabash.A (talk · contribs) 02:51, 30 July 2013 (UTC)

• I will get to this in a moment. Prabash.Akmeemana 02:51, 30 July 2013 (UTC)

Comments

• The article seems good.
• All references are where they are supposed to be.
• Article is fleshed out enough so there is nothing much to do here.

• This looks like an overall pass! Prabash.Akmeemana 17:17, 31 July 2013 (UTC)

Assessment

GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria

1. Is it reasonably well written?

   A. Prose quality, no copyvios, spelling and grammar:

   B. MoS compliance for lead, layout, words to watch, fiction, and lists:

2. Is it factually accurate and verifiable?

   A. Has an appropriate reference section:

   B. Citation to reliable sources where necessary:

   C. No original research:

3. Is it broad in its coverage?

   A. Major aspects:

   B. Focused:

4. Is it neutral?

   Fair representation without bias:

5. Is it stable?

   No edit wars, etc:

6. Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?

   A. Images are tagged with their copyright status, and valid fair use rationales are provided for non-free content:

   B. Images are provided if possible and are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions:

7. Overall:

   Pass or Fail:

   Congratulations! Prabash.Akmeemana 17:19, 31 July 2013 (UTC)