Jump to content

Talk:Harrison Afful

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Statistics

[edit]

I just added a statistics box to this page, but I was only able to find stats from Afful's time with ES Tunis and Columbus Crew SC. Seeing how far off the numbers were for each of these two clubs makes me believe that the numbers may be wrong for Feyenoord Academy and Asante Kotoko as well, but I have not been able to find any statistics from Afful's time with those two clubs. If anyone either possesses these stats/knows where they could be found/has anything that could help corroborate the apps and goals listed in his infobox, it would go a long way towards helping this page look fully complete and updated.

Thanks, 21.colinthompson (talk) 06:03, 31 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Harrison Afful. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

checkY An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 14:34, 30 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

GA Review

[edit]
GA toolbox
Reviewing
This review is transcluded from Talk:Harrison Afful/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Ammar Elbehery (talk · contribs) 23:15, 18 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I'll be reviewing this article, this shouldn't take long, hopefully. Ammar Elbehery (talk) 23:15, 18 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Hi again, I just finished reading the article, and it's very close passing, but it has a few issues concerning the citations; some of the cited sources are not relevant to what is written on the article, and it seems that citations are being reused even if the topic is different and has nothing to do with the link. Ammar Elbehery (talk) 00:02, 19 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]