Talk:Harold Interlocking

Trains Portal

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Trains, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to rail transport on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion. See also: WikiProject Trains to do list and the Trains Portal.TrainsWikipedia:WikiProject TrainsTemplate:WikiProject Trainsrail transport articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Associated projects or task forces:
/
	This article is supported by WikiProject New York City Public Transportation (assessed as Mid-importance).

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Harold Interlocking. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110513083616/http://www.dnainfo.com/20110509/midtown/new-york-awarded-350-million-for-highspeed-rail-projects to http://www.dnainfo.com/20110509/midtown/new-york-awarded-350-million-for-highspeed-rail-projects

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 09:32, 3 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Shouldn't 'The junction is located in Queens, east of the East River Tunnels and next to Amtrak’s Sunnyside Yard' read 'West of the East River Tunnels' since the junction is in Queens and east of the East River Tunnels would put it in Manhattan. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2601:19C:4702:7643:E121:F76E:ABBD:1032 (talk) 19:19, 19 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Update after

@Jhawkinson: The reason I made this edit is that the claim doesn't become outdated until after the end of 2022. You wrote in your edit summary, "Return update after to Dec. 18, one week before Christmas. If we don't know whether ESA will be complete this year by the week before Christmas, then it won't be complete this year (or the Update After date can be then extended)." However, December 18 is an arbitrary date, and it's quite possible that the MTA doesn't announce the opening date until the very last second. There is no need to extend the {{update after}} template if we set it to the end of 2022 - if the end of the year comes and goes without anything happening, then the claim will need to be updated, anyway. Epicgenius (talk) 01:08, 15 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Epicgenius: Sure. But there's no requirement that we wait until a fact is necessarily obsolete before we can update it. It's an editorial judgment as to when is the right time to do the update. And it is similarly an editorial judgment as to what date we put in the {{Update after}}, which is guidance to editors. There's nothing wrong with an arbitrary date in such a fashion.

Now, if you want to say to me, "Your editorial judgment is wrong. Mine is better." then I guess you can say that. It doesn't seem to be supported though, and I didn't think you were saying that.

Instead I thought you were saying, "The right date to put in Update after is always after something becomes obsolete, not when we have enough information to come back and check if it is obsolete," and that's not my understanding. I think it would be much wiser for us to come back and review this article before the end of the year, when we likely will know how to update the text, than to wait until we know it's going to be obsolete in January. I hope that is clear (I fear it's not). Thanks. jhawkinson (talk) 01:22, 15 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Jhawkinson, thanks. Your reasoning makes sense, actually - now that I'm rereading your edit summary, you're right that we would probably know by mid-December whether ESA would open this year. I just made that edit because I thought the article would definitely be out of date in January, rather than merely probably being out of date.

In any case, in the long run, this is a minor issue. The tag will appear anyway unless the page is updated by the end of the year, and if someone does update the page, the tag could just be removed. – Epicgenius (talk) 02:01, 15 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Track Diagram third-rail / catenary power

The diagram is labeled "Third rail begins/ends (Amtrak)" and "Catenary begins/ends (LIRR) ."

However, lirr uses 3rd rail power and amtrack uses overhead power, the reverse implied by these labels. Am I misinterpreting it? Is it wrong or just unclear? Elifeye1 (talk) 19:35, 25 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]